Systems are designed by people to support people

18
May 2023
209
A group of people are putting their hands together in a huddle.

Author: Jesse Adams, President and Founder of Ember Experience

Over the last few years, we have had the opportunity to speak with, listen to, or coach hundreds of leaders and employees throughout multiple industries across Canada. In these conversations, we have observed a recurring theme. Whenever workplace challenges arise (e.g., productivity issues, inefficiencies, cultural friction), individual behaviour is often first to be blamed for the problem.

This translates to the belief that there must be some deficiencies in individual resilience, technical skills, or motivation and willingness to “go above and beyond”. While we encourage organizations to create opportunities for individual growth, and believe that individuals have a responsibility to contribute to a thriving organization, blaming or judging individual deficiencies as the problem seems to overlook a significant issue. Design flaws within the workplace environment.

Time and time again, we find that workplace environments, specifically the systems, structures and culture in place, are not amplifying individuals, but instead creating systemic barriers that hinder the delivery of desired outcomes.  When organizations or leaders focus primarily on individual deficiencies as the source of the problem, it can increase defensiveness within cultures, widen the divide between leaders and staff, and prevent organizations from making long-lasting changes.

We believe that organizations have the responsibility to create the work conditions, leaders have the responsibility to facilitate the work conditions and individuals have the responsibility to contribute to the work conditions. When these three elements work in synergy, organizations will thrive.

Creating a thriving workplace environment requires the development and alignment of the organization’s systems, structures, and culture. We define systems as a set of elements or activities that work together to create an interconnecting network or method to achieve a specific business outcome. This can include organizational processes, policies, practices and defined key performance behaviours. We define structures as the elements within the organization that make up the business infrastructure. This can include team or department design, equipment (e.g., IT platforms), function mapping, and business plan. Culture is what brings the systems and structures to life. Culture is established by social norms, values, and interpersonal relationships of the people inside the organization.

While many organizational environments are designed with the intention to best support people's optimal work, the last few years have brought to light some of the underlying and unaddressed issues and challenges within the workplace. Employee turnover, psychological health and safety, employee burnout, and Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility (DEIA) are increasing at a rapid rate. According to a study done in 2022 by Mental Health Research Canada, 33% of employed Canadians experience burnout. In some professions, however, it is much higher (e.g., 66% of nurses, and 61% of the mental health workforce). We find these challenges have been exacerbated for a few reasons:

  1. There has been, for many years, a reliance on individuals pushing past their personal boundaries (e.g., working on weekends).
  2. There has been a culture of celebrating people who push past these personal boundaries while judging or shaming those that work within the boundaries of their employment contract.
  3. The systems, structure or culture have not been examined or updated in many years.
  4. There is a tendency to hold onto legacy norms (e.g., this worked in the past, it is the way we have always done it).

These challenges often do not exist in isolation but compound on top of one another. We recently faced such challenges within our business. In executing a recent client deliverable, a staff member gave feedback about the project. They informed me that the way we executed the work was less than an ideal experience.  In delivering this client project, we had defaulted to the “way things were done before”. We went with this approach for multiple reasons:

  1. It was a major project for our new company and we had to deliver quickly.
  2. We had several other deliverables and internal development work happening simultaneously.
  3. We had team members that had transitioned with me from a previous organization and I assumed they would know what to do.
  4. I was confident about its design as it had worked very well in the past. 

Although important context, we did not take the necessary time for a proactive and honest conversation. In choosing the path that we did, we inadvertently overlooked the unique needs of our current organization and team.

As a result, the project was choppy, confusing, and frustrating for all involved. I found myself micro-managing the team and being more directive than usual.  I even found myself pointing to gaps in team members’ skills as well as my own as a leader. After debriefing with the team, we realized that there were significant gaps in the process, norms and structures used in this situation. Some staff were not fully familiar with the previous system, while others had outgrown it. Our methodology and perspectives had organically evolved over time as well.  I realized that as the leader of a new organization, or any organization, norms and functions need to fit the structures and processes we build, and that we need to build them proactively to ensure we are creating a culture where individuals feel amplified and therefore, thrive.

The responsibility to stay in tune with your people, and create an environment that best suits your team can feel overwhelming and never-ending, especially when it involves large-scale items, such as business processes, policies, organizational design or infrastructure.

In navigating how to decide the best path forward, the following steps to be helpful:

  1. Identify the original intention and purpose of your system and structures.
  2. Evaluate the current performance.
  3. Identify the root cause or problem within the current system.
  4. Explore the feasibility of the system.
  5. Commit to action.
  6. Implement change and monitor progress.

Register for the panel discussion Wednesday, June 07, 2023 at 12:00 pm to 1:00 pm featuring Jesse Adams, Aishwarya Jayaprakash and Norah Marsh, to explore more about creating and how to implement systems and structures that can amplify the people inside your organization. https://www.cphrab.ca/professional-development/structures-and-systems-ember-experience-panel-discussion



The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Marina Perkovic July 29, 2025
Companies that invest in leadership development see real returns. According to Brandon Hall Group, organizations with strong leadership development programs are 1.5 times more likely to be financially high-performing, reinforcing the clear connection between leadership strength and business success (Brandon Hall Group, 2015). For small to mid-sized businesses, this risk can be especially high. As teams expand and complexity increases, the informal leadership structures that worked early on can start to crack. That’s where proactive leadership development and risk mitigation go hand-in-hand. The Leadership Gap Is a Hidden Business Risk According to a recent CPHR Alberta report, talent development and leadership gaps remain one of the top five organizational risks (CPHR Alberta, 2023). The consequences are rarely immediate, but they compound over time: • Missed growth opportunities • High-potential employees leaving due to lack of career clarity • Poor team morale when unprepared managers struggle to lead • Strategic drift from lack of alignment at the top A growing company without a leadership pipeline is like a car without a spare tire, it might keep rolling, but one unexpected bump can send the whole operation into a tailspin. Risk Mitigation Starts with Leadership Insight The first step in mitigating leadership risk is to move from guesswork to clarity. That means using structured tools like leadership assessments, succession planning frameworks, and targeted coaching to surface the actual capabilities of current and emerging leaders. In professional services firms, for example, it’s common to see technically strong employees promoted into management roles. While they excel in their areas of expertise, they often lack key leadership capabilities like delegation, feedback, and emotional intelligence (Gallo, 2016). Without proper development, this can lead to stalled projects, disengaged teams, and higher turnover. Leadership assessments and focused coaching are essential to identify these gaps early and build the skills needed to lead effectively. Common Leadership Risks in SMBs Every organization faces different risks, but these are some of the most common leadership vulnerabilities seen in growth-stage companies (SHRM, 2022): • Lack of succession planning: Only one person knows how to run a key function, creating bottlenecks and burnout. • Unclear decision-making authority: Teams waste time waiting for approvals or duplicating efforts due to ambiguous roles. • Promotion without preparation: High performers are promoted into leadership roles without training, leading to micromanagement or misalignment. • Poor feedback culture: A lack of honest dialogue means small issues snowball into bigger people problems. • Leadership misfit: A leader’s natural style may clash with the culture or needs of a specific team or situation. Mitigating these risks requires more than a one-time workshop. It takes intentional development, structured tools, and reinforcement over time (SHRM, 2022). What Effective Mitigation Looks Like The most successful companies don’t wait for a leadership crisis to take action. They build leadership strength proactively. Here’s what that looks like: • Leadership assessments are used during hiring and promotions to identify fit, style, and potential blind spots. • Customized coaching programs help leaders build the exact skills they need in real time, tied to their actual challenges (International Coaching Federation, 2022). • Leadership training cohorts (such as PowerUp Leadership’s “Coaching Skills for Managers” or “Authentic Leadership” programs) create a shared foundation across the organization. • Succession maps identify who is ready or could be ready for key roles in 12–24 months, creating a proactive development plan (SHRM, 2022). As companies grow, the complexity of people management increases exponentially. Systems, tools, and strategy all matter but none of them work without effective leadership behind them (McKinsey & Company, 2018). Investing in leadership development isn’t a “nice to have” for big companies, it’s a risk management strategy for every business serious about sustainable growth. 
By Marina Perkovic July 15, 2025
Author : Ada Tai Over the past month, I spoke with three professionals who had recently been laid off. April , a former schoolmate, has over 20 years of experience and has held management roles at several organizations. Most recently, she led a team at a large oil and gas company, where she was instrumental in building out a new service area. Despite her accomplishments, a combination of economic challenges and a lack of connection with her new boss led to her dismissal. Having been involved in layoffs before, she understood the process, but when she called me, she admitted it was much harder to be on the receiving end. She felt overwhelmed by a mix of emotions: denial, anger, betrayal, and a deep sense of failure. Carol , once a mentee of mine, built a strong foundation in the finance sector, and her persistence earned her a team lead role at a competitive mid-sized firm. Therefore, her call caught me off guard; she was trying to make sense of being included in a round of layoffs that affected 12 others. Having just been promoted, she struggled to understand why she had been chosen. She reached out for support as she navigated both the practical and emotional aftermath. Joe had been a student in one of my classes. With a master’s degree and excellent communication skills, he established a respected career in the regional non-profit sector. We maintained contact and often crossed paths through work. Joe was frequently involved in launching new initiatives and was recognized by both his boss and the board for his contributions. However, when the sector faced financial strain, he and his manager were among the 15% let go. He contacted me a month after the layoff; he had taken time to process everything and was now reflecting on what direction to take next. These stories are not uncommon. In fact, with ongoing economic uncertainty, many professionals, regardless of their experience or performance, are facing unexpected career changes. While layoffs are always challenging, the way they are handled can significantly impact both the individuals affected and the organization. This highlights a critical challenge for organizations: how can companies manage necessary workforce changes with both strategic foresight and genuine care? In addition to engaging the Human Resources department early in the planning and execution process, many businesses are increasingly recognizing the value of utilizing third-party outplacement services. Outplacement services are employer-sponsored programs designed to support both the business and departing employees during layoffs or organizational restructuring. Typically included as part of a severance package, these services offer more than just logistical support; they help individuals navigate a difficult transition with confidence. Outplacement services can be customized based on the needs and budget of the employer. Offerings often include planning for workforce reductions in collaboration with the business, delivering termination messages, and providing one-on-one career transition coaching and emotional support to affected staff. More importantly, these services help affected employees regain focus by offering practical job search guidance, resume coaching, and career direction tailored to their experience and industry. For employers, outplacement services can deliver a clear return on investment. Companies that provide structured transition support often experience fewer legal disputes and benefit from a stronger employer brand, which can positively influence talent attraction and retention. Showing care during a difficult time speaks volumes to internal teams, affected employees, clients, and the broader market. Having worked closely with businesses and professionals throughout this process, I’ve witnessed the significant difference that experienced, neutral third-party support can make. In fact, a 2023 CBIZ report, referencing Bureau of Labor Statistics data, noted that individuals who received outplacement assistance secured new roles 40% faster than those who did not receive support (CBIZ, 2023). Just imagine if April had access to a coach experienced in private sector transitions, or if Carol had received immediate help with processing her layoff and planning her next steps; the positive impact would have been immediate. In today’s environment, outplacement isn’t merely a nice option; it is a strategic necessity. How will your organization ensure a respectful and supportive transition for its workforce? When selecting an outplacement partner, consider factors such as industry experience, the ability to customize services, the quality of career coaches, and the integration of digital tools for job seekers. Not all providers offer the same level of support or results, so thorough vetting is essential.
By Marina Perkovic July 10, 2025
The countdown to the CPHR Alberta 2025 Conference has officially begun!
MORE NEWS