Buying Technology is not an AI Strategy: How to drive sustainable AI adoption in HR

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become part of the HR vocabulary. No longer a future ambition, many HR teams have been exploring why, how, and where AI could be used to unlock productivity, enhance capabilities, and deliver new value, as well as which technologies can deliver on this. 

However, buying technology or licenses is not an AI strategy. 

 

More than 60% of HR professionals say they do not integrate AI into their practices beyond individual productivity. This approach to adoption has led to many leaders questioning the value of AI, asking, “Is the AI hype worth the investment?”

 

In this article, we explore the reality of AI adoption and highlight the critical success factors for sustainable adoption.


Why Adoption and Integration Is So Hard

To fully harness AI's potential, HR has to move beyond task-based applications and towards deeper integration. This involves embedding AI into core HR processes, using it to inform decision-making, and leveraging it to drive strategic change. Understanding the current barriers is a starting point for this adoption and integration journey.

Our data show that both individual and organizational factors influence the appetite and extent to which AI is adopted within HR. 

At the individual level, three factors influence how HR professionals use AI:

  1. Exposure and opportunity to use AI: Confidence and competence develop through use. Where HR professionals don’t have access to or use AI tools in their roles, adoption stalls.
  2. Organizational signals and support: HR professionals use AI if it is a priority in the business and support is provided. If AI isn’t seen as a priority or is used sporadically, it’s unlikely to gain traction in HR.
  3. Sentiment: Feelings matter. Excitement, fear, and skepticism all influence how HR professionals engage with AI, even when tools are available.

At the organization level, HR teams face other challenges that impact adoption. HR leaders often struggle to articulate AI's value to the organization, which impacts buy-in, investment, and leadership sponsorship. HR teams also struggle to identify the proper use cases to apply AI and determine whether those use cases are viable. Gaining leadership buy-in becomes more complicated when the impact isn’t clear, and without a strong governance framework, execution feels risky.



Adopting a structured approach to AI value creation 

We’ve developed an AI readiness framework to help HR teams to overcome the challenges they face in driving adoption. The framework consists of four interrelated components centered around the promise of value.

Defining the Promise of Value

Any successful AI strategy begins with a clear promise of value. Rather than adopting AI for experimentation, HR leaders should start by answering a fundamental question: Why should we use AI in the first place?

This anchors AI adoption in a compelling business case, focusing on real value rather than novelty. Key questions to explore include:

  • Why do we want to use AI?
  • Where can AI generate value, and are those areas critical to our business?
  • How can AI help us achieve our strategic objectives?

The promise of value should articulate the outcomes AI can support - whether efficiency, enabling faster and better decision-making, enhancing employee experiences, or accelerating service delivery.


From Value to Opportunity: Identifying Where AI Can Make a Difference

Once the value is defined, it is translated into concrete opportunities. This involves identifying specific use cases where AI could make an impact. Start as wide as possible, building a comprehensive list of potential applications across your HR ecosystem.

Then, shift from possibilities to practicality. Evaluate each use case based on three key criteria:

  • Affordability: What is the cost of implementation?
  • Viability: Is it technically and operationally feasible?
  • Value realization: How well does it deliver on the promised outcomes?

This process turns a broad list into a strategic shortlist of viable, high-impact AI applications that align with your business priorities.



From Strategy to Execution: Turning Intent into Action

The final phase of the framework moves from planning to doing, focusing on enabling successful implementation. Execution is built on two pillars:

  • Governance, risk, and oversight structures: Strong governance ensures AI is deployed ethically, transparently, and responsibly. It builds trust with stakeholders and safeguards against unintended consequences.
  • An AI adoption roadmap: A phased roadmap translates strategy into action. It outlines the steps for implementation, supported by proper training, change management, and stakeholder engagement - ensuring adoption is sustainable and scalable.

This structured approach allows HR leaders to move beyond the hype toward a meaningful, business-aligned AI strategy.


Final Words

Being AI-ready isn’t just about knowing what the tools can do. It’s about learning how to use them to drive real value for HR professionals, the HR function, and the organization. The question is not whether AI will impact HR - it already has. 

About the Authors


Dr. Marna van der Merwe

Dr. Marna van der Merwe is an Organizational Psychologist and leads the Thought Leadership and Insights Practice at the Academy to Innovate. She has over 15 years of experience in Human Resources, Employee Experience, Organizational Effectiveness, and Strategic Talent Management. She is a researcher, published author, and regular conference speaker on the future of work, the impact of AI on work, talent management, experience design, and the changing nature of careers.


Dr. Dieter Veldsman

Dr. Dieter Veldsman is the Chief HR Scientist at the Academy to Innovate HR and a Professor of Practice at the University of Johannesburg. He is an organizational psychologist with 17+ years of experience across the HR value chain and lifecycle, having worked for and consulted with various organizations in EMEA, APAC, and LATAM. He has held the positions of Group Chief People Officer, Organizational Effectiveness Executive, Director of Consulting Solutions, and Chief Research Scientist. He is a regular speaker on the topics of Strategic HR, Future of Work, AI in HR, Employee Experience and Organisational Development.

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



Mental Health in the Agriculture Industry

By Jessica Jaithoo • August 8, 2025
Author : Nicole Mahieux, Nick Canning & Kendal Tremblay Mental health is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of employee well-being, business resilience and community strength. For HR professionals, supporting mental health is no longer optional—it’s imperative. While conversations around mental health have gained traction in many industries, one critical sector still faces unique and persistent challenges: agriculture. Farmers and agricultural workers play a vital role in food production and national food security. Yet they are among the most vulnerable when it comes to mental health struggles. In fact, they experience some of the highest rates of stress, anxiety, depression—and even suicide. This is not just a personal issue. It's a workforce issue. It's a public health issue. It's a business issue. There are a range of compounding pressures makes farming one of the most mentally taxing professions.  These include: 1.Financial Stress & Unpredictability Unstable markets, weather-dependent outcomes, and shifting government policies contribute to a constant sense of economic uncertainty. 2. Isolation Many farmers work alone and live in rural areas where access to social support is limited. Social isolation increases vulnerability to mental health concerns. 3. Stigma Although mental health stigma is slowly decreasing, it remains a barrier—especially among men, who represent 74% of the agricultural workforce. Traditional gender norms often discourage open conversations or help-seeking.

CPHR Alberta’s Commitment to Supporting Reservists

By Jessica Jaithoo • August 7, 2025
As a proud participant in the Glowing Hearts program , CPHR Alberta continues to champion the value that Canadian Armed Forces reservists bring to our workplaces. Since joining the program, we’ve seen firsthand how supporting reservists not only strengthens our communities but also enhances organizational resilience and leadership. The Value of Reservists in the Workplace Reservists are more than military personnel—they are strategic thinkers, adaptable leaders, and skilled collaborators. Their training equips them with discipline, problem-solving abilities, and a mission-focused mindset that translates seamlessly into civilian roles. Captain McKenzie Kibler of The Loyal Edmonton Regiment exemplifies this. In a recent deployment on Operation REASSURANCE, he developed leadership and operational skills that now enrich his civilian career. Watch his story here. Support, Recognition, and Incentives for Employers Supporting reservists doesn’t mean sacrificing business continuity—in fact, it opens the door to meaningful recognition and financial support. Through the Compensation for Employers of Reservists Program (CERP) , employers can receive grants to help offset operational costs when a reservist-employee is away for 30 days or more. At the same time, organizations that register their reservist leave policies with the Glowing Hearts program are publicly recognized on the Canadian Forces Liaison Council website and receive a certificate of support and digital badge. These benefits not only ease the logistical challenges of supporting reservists but also position your organization as a leader in community engagement and national service. Tools and Templates for HR Leaders To make it easier for organizations to support reservists, CPHR Alberta offers a Reservist Leave Policy Template. This resource outlines eligibility, leave procedures, compensation, and compliance with federal and provincial legislation—making it simple to implement a supportive policy. Access the template through the Member Portal.

Leadership Risk Isn't Just a C-Suite Concern

By Marina Perkovic • July 29, 2025
Companies that invest in leadership development see real returns. According to Brandon Hall Group, organizations with strong leadership development programs are 1.5 times more likely to be financially high-performing, reinforcing the clear connection between leadership strength and business success (Brandon Hall Group, 2015). For small to mid-sized businesses, this risk can be especially high. As teams expand and complexity increases, the informal leadership structures that worked early on can start to crack. That’s where proactive leadership development and risk mitigation go hand-in-hand. The Leadership Gap Is a Hidden Business Risk According to a recent CPHR Alberta report, talent development and leadership gaps remain one of the top five organizational risks (CPHR Alberta, 2023). The consequences are rarely immediate, but they compound over time: • Missed growth opportunities • High-potential employees leaving due to lack of career clarity • Poor team morale when unprepared managers struggle to lead • Strategic drift from lack of alignment at the top A growing company without a leadership pipeline is like a car without a spare tire, it might keep rolling, but one unexpected bump can send the whole operation into a tailspin. Risk Mitigation Starts with Leadership Insight The first step in mitigating leadership risk is to move from guesswork to clarity. That means using structured tools like leadership assessments, succession planning frameworks, and targeted coaching to surface the actual capabilities of current and emerging leaders. In professional services firms, for example, it’s common to see technically strong employees promoted into management roles. While they excel in their areas of expertise, they often lack key leadership capabilities like delegation, feedback, and emotional intelligence (Gallo, 2016). Without proper development, this can lead to stalled projects, disengaged teams, and higher turnover. Leadership assessments and focused coaching are essential to identify these gaps early and build the skills needed to lead effectively. Common Leadership Risks in SMBs Every organization faces different risks, but these are some of the most common leadership vulnerabilities seen in growth-stage companies (SHRM, 2022): • Lack of succession planning: Only one person knows how to run a key function, creating bottlenecks and burnout. • Unclear decision-making authority: Teams waste time waiting for approvals or duplicating efforts due to ambiguous roles. • Promotion without preparation: High performers are promoted into leadership roles without training, leading to micromanagement or misalignment. • Poor feedback culture: A lack of honest dialogue means small issues snowball into bigger people problems. • Leadership misfit: A leader’s natural style may clash with the culture or needs of a specific team or situation. Mitigating these risks requires more than a one-time workshop. It takes intentional development, structured tools, and reinforcement over time (SHRM, 2022). What Effective Mitigation Looks Like The most successful companies don’t wait for a leadership crisis to take action. They build leadership strength proactively. Here’s what that looks like: • Leadership assessments are used during hiring and promotions to identify fit, style, and potential blind spots. • Customized coaching programs help leaders build the exact skills they need in real time, tied to their actual challenges (International Coaching Federation, 2022). • Leadership training cohorts (such as PowerUp Leadership’s “Coaching Skills for Managers” or “Authentic Leadership” programs) create a shared foundation across the organization. • Succession maps identify who is ready or could be ready for key roles in 12–24 months, creating a proactive development plan (SHRM, 2022). As companies grow, the complexity of people management increases exponentially. Systems, tools, and strategy all matter but none of them work without effective leadership behind them (McKinsey & Company, 2018). Investing in leadership development isn’t a “nice to have” for big companies, it’s a risk management strategy for every business serious about sustainable growth. 
MORE NEWS