The Importance of Employee Feedback for Identifying Crises

Author : Shannon Walker 

The Problem 

Regular employee feedback is necessary for a comprehensive risk management strategy. Employees, partners, investors and management are all key stakeholders in maintaining the health of your operations. Strong employee feedback mechanisms allow everyone to ask questions, provide suggestions, and report on ethical breaches or security risks. When feedback is taken and implemented, employees feel more valued, which helps to increase retention, foster trust and create a sense of mutual accountability. The reverse of this situation is low employee engagement and satisfaction and an increased risk of internal breaches. 

Understanding Employee Feedback 

Employee feedback in the workplace should be transparent, accessible, and enforce a culture of non-retaliation. This means all concerns are taken seriously, actionable steps are outlined and shared with respective parties, and employees do not fear that they will be punished for anything they have reported on. From workplace frustrations to more serious issues like organizational fraud and misconduct, the necessary procedures must be in place to encourage reporting and facilitate escalation when necessary.

Proactive Mechanisms for Conducting Employee Feedback 

Employee Feedback Surveys 

Organizations can generally keep their finger on the pulse of company culture and employee angst–if any—through regularly scheduled employee feedback surveys. Most organizations schedule surveys every few months that ask both closed-ended and open-ended questions. These surveys should be administered anonymously and can give a general idea of overall employee satisfaction with the organization. Unfortunately, employee feedback surveys fall short of finding situational insight and identifying specific areas needing improvement. 

1-1 Meetings

A better mechanism for gaining valuable information from employees on a regular basis is through having recurring 1-1 meetings between employees and managers at all levels. This includes having the highest-level executives meet with operational managers to help avoid large disconnects in compliance and company objectives from forming. These meetings share two-way flows of feedback where employees can bring their input and concerns to the table in an environment that is focused on their professional growth. Employees should feel comfortable sharing their concerns and have confidence that when a sensitive issue is brought forward, it will be escalated to the right person. 

Anonymous Reporting Tools 

Lastly, anonymous reporting tools are used in various industries, on both large and small scales, to help encourage employee feedback and mitigate crises before they happen. Employees are provided with a process to report any wrongdoing they’ve witnessed in the workplace. In the primarily digital workforce, most companies chose to implement an omnichannel reporting system that combines online intake and hotlines. Whether the employee is reporting to an agent directly or filling out an intake form, the goal is to create a comprehensive report of the complaint without recording identifiable information about the employee. 

Whether you decide to run your reporting tool internally or outsource to a third-party provider, you must ensure it is available 24/7/365 to encourage employees to make reports at their earliest convenience. Additionally, for larger, more diverse firms, having the reporting tool available in multiple languages will be crucial for creating a truly accessible tool and encouraging participation. Tracking reports in an organized and efficient manner will be vital for maintaining the integrity of the reporting system. By streamlining the filing process, cases will be forwarded to the appropriate department and allow for any necessary investigations to take place faster. 

Implement policies and processes for employee feedback

To increase confidence in feedback tools, all mechanisms for performance reviews and employees reporting their concerns should have outlined policies and best practices. Organizations must ensure all reports are dealt with in a timely manner through auditing regularly and keeping their reporting systems up to date. Managerial levels can help maintain the integrity of feedback and the process, by only sharing details on a need-to-know basis. Ensure your policy outlines what kinds of issues need transparency, versus what issues should be kept confidential. The anonymity clauses should be supported through robust anti-retaliation policies that confirm no employee will be reprimanded for coming forward, further solidifying your organization’s commitment to creating a speak-up culture.

There is no silver bullet solution for encouraging employee feedback in the workplace. However, having the right feedback mechanisms will be vital for identifying and addressing crises sooner. Combining surveys, 1-1 meetings and self-starting feedback tools with varying degrees of anonymity will help encourage a speak-up culture in your organization. Ensure you have the necessary policy in place for how to use these tools best then work to maintain a transparent environment and catch potential crises before it affects your business.


About the Author

Shannon Walker is the founder and president of WhistleBlower Security Inc.(WBS), a global provider of ethics reporting services and the EVP Strategy at Case IQ.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Jessica Jaithoo August 19, 2026
Author: Kanwaljit Chaudhry We often begin developing leaders after we have given them something to lead. Someone is promoted into their first supervisory role. They join a leadership development program, receive coaching, attend workshops, or are paired with a mentor. All of these can be valuable. But by then, leadership development has already been happening. Long before the title arrives, people are learning how to exercise judgment, influence others, navigate disagreement, take responsibility and make decisions when the answer is not obvious. The question for HR is: Do we have to wait for the title to help those capabilities grow? Create opportunities, not just programs Some of the most valuable leadership development happens through work itself. A stretch assignment. Leading a small project. Presenting an idea to senior colleagues. Coordinating people who do not report to you. Navigating competing priorities. Being trusted to make a decision rather than simply carrying one out. None requires a management title. HR can help organizations look at development as not only as courses people attend, but as experiences people need. That may mean encouraging managers to distribute meaningful opportunities rather than repeatedly turning to the person who is already proven. It may mean designing project work so different employees have opportunities to lead. It may mean making mentoring, coaching or job-shadowing available before someone enters a formal leadership pipeline. The objective is not to make everyone a manager. It is to give more people opportunities to build capabilities that will serve them whether or not formal leadership is their eventual destination. Make room to learn from experience Experience alone does not necessarily create development. Two people can go through similar experiences and take very different things from them. What often makes the difference is the opportunity to reflect: What worked? What didn't? What did I notice about myself? What would I do differently next time? HR can help make those conversations part of development rather than leaving them to chance. A manager checking in after a difficult project can ask more than, “Did we deliver?” A mentor can help someone examine why a conversation went differently than expected. A performance discussion can explore not only what someone accomplished, but how they influenced others, exercised judgment or responded when things became uncertain. These are relatively small interventions. But they help turn experience into learning. Notice leadership before it becomes obvious There is another role for HR: helping organizations broaden what they notice. Potential does not always announce itself loudly. The person who volunteers to coordinate a complicated piece of work may be demonstrating leadership capacity. So might the employee who brings people together when a team is stuck, asks the question no one else is asking, helps a colleague succeed without needing credit, or remains thoughtful when everyone else is rushing toward an answer. If we look for leadership potential only among those who already resemble our current leaders, we may keep finding the same kinds of people.  Creating broader opportunities allows capability to become visible before we decide who has it. Pay attention to what the organization teaches Organizations are also developing future leaders when they are not deliberately trying to. Employees notice who gets promoted. They notice what behaviour gets rewarded, whose ideas receive attention and what happens when someone makes a mistake. They notice whether managers share information or protect it, whether difficult conversations are avoided or handled respectfully, and whether asking for help is treated as good judgment or weakness. These observations become lessons about what leadership looks like here. HR influences many of the systems through which those lessons are reinforced e.g., performance management, recognition, development, succession planning and promotion among them. That makes an important question worth asking: What are our people learning about leadership from the way our organization actually works? The answer may tell us as much about our leadership pipeline as any competency framework. Before the title Leadership development does not have to begin with a leadership program. It can begin when someone is trusted with something slightly beyond what they have done before and supported while they figure it out. It can happen when a manager shares the reasoning behind a difficult decision rather than only communicating the outcome. It can happen when someone gets to lead a project before they have people reporting to them. And it can happen when an employee has someone who helps them make sense of an experience rather than simply move on to the next task. HR cannot manufacture leaders. But HR can help create workplaces where people have opportunities to practise judgment, responsibility, influence and reflection long before a title makes those things part of their job description. Perhaps the question is not only “Who are our future leaders?” It is also: “What are we doing today that gives future leadership capacity a chance to emerge?”
By Marina Perkovic July 22, 2026
At the CPHR Alberta Conference, we asked HR leaders one question: What leadership capability matters most for the future of your organization? Leaders picked up a star and placed it beside their answer. By the end of the conference, HR leaders cast 131 votes across 16 capabilities. Three stood out, with two tied for first place. Here is what they told us. What the Data Showed The capabilities on the board came from Bright Wire's PLUS Leadership Framework, a proprietary model built to define what effective leadership looks like across every level of an organization and is organized across four dimensions: Courageous Coach-Like Disciplined for Results and Relational The results below reflect the capabilities HR professionals believe matter most. 
By Jessica Jaithoo July 9, 2026
Author: Robin Daultani Mental health support. Fitness benefits. Stress management resources. Workplace wellness programs have evolved significantly over the past decade. Yet one foundational pillar of employee health and performance remains conspicuously absent from most wellness strategies: sleep. The cost of this gap is staggering. A landmark RAND Corporation study¹ found that insufficient sleep costs the Canadian economy up to $21.4 billion annually, through a combination of absenteeism and reduced productivity. A Gallup study² reinforced this finding, showing that poor sleepers report more than double the rate of unplanned absences compared to other workers. And a 2026 Wellhub study³ found that 83% of employees identify poor sleep as a contributing factor to burnout, a figure that demands attention when nearly nine in ten employees report burnout symptoms annually. Consider what this looks like in practice. A team member who slept poorly scrolls through emails at 7am already feeling behind. By mid-morning, a decision that should take minutes stretches into a 45-minute deliberation. After lunch, focus drops sharply, not because of the workload, but because the brain is running on insufficient rest. By 3pm, a second coffee masks the fatigue but does nothing for the impaired judgment underneath. Research shows that after 17 hours of continuous wakefulness, the equivalent of a normal waking day ending at 11pm, cognitive impairment matches that of someone who is legally intoxicated⁴. This is not an unusual day. For many employees, this is every day. Sleep rarely appears on the wellness agenda, leaving a significant and measurable performance gap unaddressed. The reason is partly cultural. Sleep is still widely perceived as a personal responsibility. But the research suggests otherwise: sleep is not a personal indulgence. It is a performance lever that affects every metric HR professionals are already tracking: productivity, absenteeism, burnout, and retention. The same RAND study¹ that quantified the cost of insufficient sleep also found the flipside: if Canadians who sleep under six hours started sleeping just one hour more per night, it could add $12 billion to the national economy. The returns are not theoretical. They are measurable, achievable, and waiting to be captured. The good news is that addressing sleep does not require a major overhaul of existing wellness programs. Organizations can start by simply putting sleep on the wellness agenda. Most workplace wellness surveys ask about stress, mental health, and physical activity. Adding questions about sleep quality or duration to existing wellness assessments can provide baseline data to identify and measure the scope of the issue within their workforce. Leaders and managers who openly prioritize rest and recovery give permission for the rest of the organization to do the same. Small cultural shifts like discouraging late-night emails or respecting boundaries around after-hours communication can quietly improve sleep conditions across an entire team. None of these require a budget. They require intentional inclusion. Now consider what becomes possible. A team member, after two weeks of consistent, quality sleep, arrives at work already focused. The mid-morning decision is made in minutes. The afternoon dip is manageable, not debilitating. The second coffee becomes optional, not essential. Nothing else about their workload or responsibilities has changed. They show up more empathetic and more present for their customers, peers, and family. The only difference is how well they slept. The performance gap between these two versions of the same employee is not marginal. It is the difference between surviving and thriving. The question for HR professionals is no longer whether sleep affects organizational performance. The research has answered that definitively. The question is whether sleep has earned a place in their wellness strategy. And if not, what that gap is quietly costing their organization.
MORE NEWS