The Importance of Employee Feedback for Identifying Crises

Author : Shannon Walker 

The Problem 

Regular employee feedback is necessary for a comprehensive risk management strategy. Employees, partners, investors and management are all key stakeholders in maintaining the health of your operations. Strong employee feedback mechanisms allow everyone to ask questions, provide suggestions, and report on ethical breaches or security risks. When feedback is taken and implemented, employees feel more valued, which helps to increase retention, foster trust and create a sense of mutual accountability. The reverse of this situation is low employee engagement and satisfaction and an increased risk of internal breaches. 

Understanding Employee Feedback 

Employee feedback in the workplace should be transparent, accessible, and enforce a culture of non-retaliation. This means all concerns are taken seriously, actionable steps are outlined and shared with respective parties, and employees do not fear that they will be punished for anything they have reported on. From workplace frustrations to more serious issues like organizational fraud and misconduct, the necessary procedures must be in place to encourage reporting and facilitate escalation when necessary.

Proactive Mechanisms for Conducting Employee Feedback 

Employee Feedback Surveys 

Organizations can generally keep their finger on the pulse of company culture and employee angst–if any—through regularly scheduled employee feedback surveys. Most organizations schedule surveys every few months that ask both closed-ended and open-ended questions. These surveys should be administered anonymously and can give a general idea of overall employee satisfaction with the organization. Unfortunately, employee feedback surveys fall short of finding situational insight and identifying specific areas needing improvement. 

1-1 Meetings

A better mechanism for gaining valuable information from employees on a regular basis is through having recurring 1-1 meetings between employees and managers at all levels. This includes having the highest-level executives meet with operational managers to help avoid large disconnects in compliance and company objectives from forming. These meetings share two-way flows of feedback where employees can bring their input and concerns to the table in an environment that is focused on their professional growth. Employees should feel comfortable sharing their concerns and have confidence that when a sensitive issue is brought forward, it will be escalated to the right person. 

Anonymous Reporting Tools 

Lastly, anonymous reporting tools are used in various industries, on both large and small scales, to help encourage employee feedback and mitigate crises before they happen. Employees are provided with a process to report any wrongdoing they’ve witnessed in the workplace. In the primarily digital workforce, most companies chose to implement an omnichannel reporting system that combines online intake and hotlines. Whether the employee is reporting to an agent directly or filling out an intake form, the goal is to create a comprehensive report of the complaint without recording identifiable information about the employee. 

Whether you decide to run your reporting tool internally or outsource to a third-party provider, you must ensure it is available 24/7/365 to encourage employees to make reports at their earliest convenience. Additionally, for larger, more diverse firms, having the reporting tool available in multiple languages will be crucial for creating a truly accessible tool and encouraging participation. Tracking reports in an organized and efficient manner will be vital for maintaining the integrity of the reporting system. By streamlining the filing process, cases will be forwarded to the appropriate department and allow for any necessary investigations to take place faster. 

Implement policies and processes for employee feedback

To increase confidence in feedback tools, all mechanisms for performance reviews and employees reporting their concerns should have outlined policies and best practices. Organizations must ensure all reports are dealt with in a timely manner through auditing regularly and keeping their reporting systems up to date. Managerial levels can help maintain the integrity of feedback and the process, by only sharing details on a need-to-know basis. Ensure your policy outlines what kinds of issues need transparency, versus what issues should be kept confidential. The anonymity clauses should be supported through robust anti-retaliation policies that confirm no employee will be reprimanded for coming forward, further solidifying your organization’s commitment to creating a speak-up culture.

There is no silver bullet solution for encouraging employee feedback in the workplace. However, having the right feedback mechanisms will be vital for identifying and addressing crises sooner. Combining surveys, 1-1 meetings and self-starting feedback tools with varying degrees of anonymity will help encourage a speak-up culture in your organization. Ensure you have the necessary policy in place for how to use these tools best then work to maintain a transparent environment and catch potential crises before it affects your business.


About the Author

Shannon Walker is the founder and president of WhistleBlower Security Inc. (WBS), a global provider of ethics reporting services and the EVP Strategy at Case IQ.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Jessica Jaithoo August 26, 2025
Author : Veronica Flores, CPHR, Wood Buffalo Chapter In the fast-paced world of HR, we often talk about unconscious bias, diversity, and inclusion. But one subtle form of bias that continues to shape workplace dynamics, often without us realizing it, is the halo effect . The halo effect, as outlined in Canadian Organizational Behaviour by McShane, Steen, and Tasa, is a perceptual bias where our overall impression of someone, often shaped by a single trait, influences how we judge their other qualities. I experienced the halo effect in a way that has stayed with me ever since. As someone who immigrated to Canada from a vibrant Latino community, I brought with me not only my culture and language but also a strong set of personal values: dedication to excellence, deep respect for others, and a belief in the power of organization and continuous improvement. Over the years, I've built a life in Canada and grown professionally. One thing my colleagues quickly noticed? I’m extremely organized—my files are color-coded, I like to automate tasks and improve processes, and I genuinely believe that a tidy environment leads to a clear mind. But one day, that very strength—my love for order—became the only lens through which someone saw me, and not in the way I expected. Our team was switching workstations, and I noticed a new coworker, someone from a different cultural background, standing near their new desk, not quite settling in. I casually asked if they had moved in yet, and they replied, “I’m just waiting for you to clean it first.”  At first, I laughed, thinking it was a joke. But their expression stayed serious. That’s when it hit me: they had assumed I was there to clean their desk. Why? Because I’m Latina? Because I’m tidy? Because I was organizing my own space? I simply showed them where the cleaning supplies were and walked away. But the moment stayed with me, not just because it was uncomfortable, but because it revealed something deeper about how we perceive each other at work. Later, I opened up to another coworker about what had happened. She shared a story of her own: because she is from China, a colleague once asked her to perform acupuncture or massage their neck, assuming she must know traditional Chinese medicine. She was just as stunned as I had been. These assumptions weren’t rooted in malice, but they were rooted in stereotypes. And they show how the halo effect, when combined with cultural bias, can lead to reductive and even offensive conclusions. The Hidden Cost of Snap Judgments The halo effect doesn’t always manifest in such overt ways. Sometimes, it’s as subtle as assuming a soft-spoken employee lacks leadership potential or that someone who struggles with English isn’t as intelligent. These assumptions can influence hiring decisions, performance evaluations, and even day-to-day interactions. For HR professionals, the implications are significant. When we allow the halo effect to guide our perceptions, we risk reinforcing stereotypes and limiting opportunities for others. Worse, we may unknowingly create environments where people feel unseen or misjudged. Strategies to Counter the Halo Effect Here are a few practical ways HR professionals can help reduce the impact of the halo effect in their organizations: Get to know people beyond the surface. Take time to learn about your coworkers’ skills, experiences, and goals. Be mindful of cultural assumptions. Just because someone is from a particular background doesn’t mean they fit a cultural stereotype. Create space for conversations. Sharing stories, like the ones my coworker and I exchanged, can build empathy and awareness. Focus on inclusion, not just diversity. It’s not enough to have different people in the room. We need to ensure everyone is seen and valued for who they truly are. The halo effect reminds us that perception is powerful, but not always accurate. That day in the office reminded me that even positive traits can be misinterpreted when viewed through the wrong lens. And that inclusion means more than just being present; it means being seen clearly. So, as an HR professional, ask yourself: Are you seeing your coworkers for who they really are, or just through the halo of a single trait?
By Jessica Jaithoo August 8, 2025
Author : Nicole Mahieux, Nick Canning & Kendal Tremblay Mental health is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of employee well-being, business resilience and community strength. For HR professionals, supporting mental health is no longer optional—it’s imperative. While conversations around mental health have gained traction in many industries, one critical sector still faces unique and persistent challenges: agriculture. Farmers and agricultural workers play a vital role in food production and national food security. Yet they are among the most vulnerable when it comes to mental health struggles. In fact, they experience some of the highest rates of stress, anxiety, depression—and even suicide. This is not just a personal issue. It's a workforce issue. It's a public health issue. It's a business issue. There are a range of compounding pressures makes farming one of the most mentally taxing professions.  These include: 1.Financial Stress & Unpredictability Unstable markets, weather-dependent outcomes, and shifting government policies contribute to a constant sense of economic uncertainty. 2. Isolation Many farmers work alone and live in rural areas where access to social support is limited. Social isolation increases vulnerability to mental health concerns. 3. Stigma Although mental health stigma is slowly decreasing, it remains a barrier—especially among men, who represent 74% of the agricultural workforce. Traditional gender norms often discourage open conversations or help-seeking.
By Jessica Jaithoo August 7, 2025
As a proud participant in the Glowing Hearts program , CPHR Alberta continues to champion the value that Canadian Armed Forces reservists bring to our workplaces. Since joining the program, we’ve seen firsthand how supporting reservists not only strengthens our communities but also enhances organizational resilience and leadership. The Value of Reservists in the Workplace Reservists are more than military personnel—they are strategic thinkers, adaptable leaders, and skilled collaborators. Their training equips them with discipline, problem-solving abilities, and a mission-focused mindset that translates seamlessly into civilian roles. Captain McKenzie Kibler of The Loyal Edmonton Regiment exemplifies this. In a recent deployment on Operation REASSURANCE, he developed leadership and operational skills that now enrich his civilian career. Watch his story here. Support, Recognition, and Incentives for Employers Supporting reservists doesn’t mean sacrificing business continuity—in fact, it opens the door to meaningful recognition and financial support. Through the Compensation for Employers of Reservists Program (CERP) , employers can receive grants to help offset operational costs when a reservist-employee is away for 30 days or more. At the same time, organizations that register their reservist leave policies with the Glowing Hearts program are publicly recognized on the Canadian Forces Liaison Council website and receive a certificate of support and digital badge. These benefits not only ease the logistical challenges of supporting reservists but also position your organization as a leader in community engagement and national service. Tools and Templates for HR Leaders To make it easier for organizations to support reservists, CPHR Alberta offers a Reservist Leave Policy Template. This resource outlines eligibility, leave procedures, compensation, and compliance with federal and provincial legislation—making it simple to implement a supportive policy. Access the template through the Member Portal.
MORE NEWS