Are you a candidate for the Senior Path to the CPHR designation?

08
Sep 2022
490
A path going through a forest lined with trees and grass.
Photo Credit: 
Johannes Plenio

Author : Debbi Ross

Are you a candidate for the Senior Path to the CPHR designation?

If you have a degree or masters in any subject, have worked for more than ten years in a professional HR role and can provide evidence that you have at least five years of experience at a senior HR level role, you may be a good candidate for the Senior Path Evaluation (SPEVA). 

The Senior Path allows individuals who did not complete an HR program at a post-secondary institution, yet have extensive HR career experience to apply for, and potentially receive the CPHR designation.  We recognize that some HR professionals achieve the knowledge and skills required to practice competently and ethically through extensive work experience. The Senior Path gives credit for many years of HR experience and expertise and does not require the applicant to write an exam.

The Senior Path allows for either Generalists or Specialists to qualify for the CPHR designation, as long as you have strategic level work experience, have had a large impact on your organization, are at a high level of decision-making authority and can demonstrate competence as required under the CPHR Canada Competency Framework.

Review Requirements for the Senior Path Experience Validation Assessment here

Tips for Successful Senior Path EVA Applications

If you feel you qualify for the Senior Path, submit a Senior Path Questionnaire through your member profile. Once approved for the Senior Path, you will then need to complete your Senior Path EVA Application.

In the SPEVA application, you will be asked to demonstrate how you meet the competencies as outlined. The most important thing to remember when writing examples for these competencies, is that the reviewer is assessing how your answer provides proof of your ability to apply experience, knowledge and skill, at a high standard, in each of the competency areas.

The reviewer needs to confirm that you not only understand HR principles, theory, and best practice, but that you have real-world workplace experience in applying that knowledge. 

The reviewer is also looking  to determine your level of independence, autonomy and decision-making authority as you cite your examples and describe your experiences.

Writing Good Examples for Competencies

When offering examples for each competency, we strongly recommend using a template referred to as STAR.

STAR examples describe the Situation , the Timeframe , the Actions YOU took, (or decisions you made) and  the Results

Before you start writing, make sure that the example you are using is the best demonstration of the functional dimension or enabling competency being discussed. writing.  Ask a colleague for input if needed. 

Answer the following questions to help you build your STAR example.

Situation:

  1. What was your role?
  2. what was at stake?
  3. what factors were at play?
  4. what types of decisions were required?
  5. How much responsibility, autonomy and decision-making authority did you have?
  6. Who else was involved?

Timeframe:

  1. When did this happen? 
  2. How long did it take?  
  3. What time pressures were you under? 
  4. Was time a factor that influenced your actions?

Actions:

  1. What actions did you take to address the situation?
  2. What risks did you think about? 
  3. How did you assess risk?  
  4. What information did you have, need, or seek? 
  5. What analysis did you undertake?
  6. What advice did you seek? 
  7. What decision did you make, and why? 
  8. Where did your authority start and end?

Results:

  1. What happened? 
  2. What was the outcome for HR, managers, employees, or your company?
  3. Did you look back and analyze your actions? 
  4. What did you learn?

In all examples, it is critical to explicitly describe your independence, autonomy and decision-making authority.   

Reviewers need to know what types of decisions you would routinely make, and where your authority starts and ends. Be sure to include the impact of your decision-making. Please note if you were required to consult with your manager, if you were an advisor to a decision maker or if you made the decision yourself.   Avoid using the word “we” and use “I” sentences to describe your actions and contributions. This is very helpful for the reviewer to make their determination of whether you meet this important requirement. 

Closing Notes

An EVA application under the Senior Path is a big undertaking and you should expect it to take considerable time to draft, review, revise, update and submit your application.  It is not necessary to provide examples in all functional dimensions. Instead, spend time submitting examples in your strongest areas while ensuring you meet the minimum number required.   

Applications are reviewed by three independent reviewers.  They all take their task of reviewing and assessing your application very seriously and spend many hours comparing your answers to the standards required. Take time to carefully consider your examples and follow the STAR method for each example making it easier to review and approve your application. We also recommend that you proofread your application for grammar, spelling and other mistakes prior to submission.  We want everyone to be as successful as possible. Best of luck!

 


 

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.

 


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Jessica Jaithoo August 8, 2025
Author : Nicole Mahieux, Nick Canning & Kendal Tremblay Mental health is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of employee well-being, business resilience and community strength. For HR professionals, supporting mental health is no longer optional—it’s imperative. While conversations around mental health have gained traction in many industries, one critical sector still faces unique and persistent challenges: agriculture. Farmers and agricultural workers play a vital role in food production and national food security. Yet they are among the most vulnerable when it comes to mental health struggles. In fact, they experience some of the highest rates of stress, anxiety, depression—and even suicide. This is not just a personal issue. It's a workforce issue. It's a public health issue. It's a business issue. There are a range of compounding pressures makes farming one of the most mentally taxing professions.  These include: 1.Financial Stress & Unpredictability Unstable markets, weather-dependent outcomes, and shifting government policies contribute to a constant sense of economic uncertainty. 2. Isolation Many farmers work alone and live in rural areas where access to social support is limited. Social isolation increases vulnerability to mental health concerns. 3. Stigma Although mental health stigma is slowly decreasing, it remains a barrier—especially among men, who represent 74% of the agricultural workforce. Traditional gender norms often discourage open conversations or help-seeking.
By Jessica Jaithoo August 7, 2025
As a proud participant in the Glowing Hearts program , CPHR Alberta continues to champion the value that Canadian Armed Forces reservists bring to our workplaces. Since joining the program, we’ve seen firsthand how supporting reservists not only strengthens our communities but also enhances organizational resilience and leadership. The Value of Reservists in the Workplace Reservists are more than military personnel—they are strategic thinkers, adaptable leaders, and skilled collaborators. Their training equips them with discipline, problem-solving abilities, and a mission-focused mindset that translates seamlessly into civilian roles. Captain McKenzie Kibler of The Loyal Edmonton Regiment exemplifies this. In a recent deployment on Operation REASSURANCE, he developed leadership and operational skills that now enrich his civilian career. Watch his story here. Support, Recognition, and Incentives for Employers Supporting reservists doesn’t mean sacrificing business continuity—in fact, it opens the door to meaningful recognition and financial support. Through the Compensation for Employers of Reservists Program (CERP) , employers can receive grants to help offset operational costs when a reservist-employee is away for 30 days or more. At the same time, organizations that register their reservist leave policies with the Glowing Hearts program are publicly recognized on the Canadian Forces Liaison Council website and receive a certificate of support and digital badge. These benefits not only ease the logistical challenges of supporting reservists but also position your organization as a leader in community engagement and national service. Tools and Templates for HR Leaders To make it easier for organizations to support reservists, CPHR Alberta offers a Reservist Leave Policy Template. This resource outlines eligibility, leave procedures, compensation, and compliance with federal and provincial legislation—making it simple to implement a supportive policy. Access the template through the Member Portal.
By Marina Perkovic July 29, 2025
Companies that invest in leadership development see real returns. According to Brandon Hall Group, organizations with strong leadership development programs are 1.5 times more likely to be financially high-performing, reinforcing the clear connection between leadership strength and business success (Brandon Hall Group, 2015). For small to mid-sized businesses, this risk can be especially high. As teams expand and complexity increases, the informal leadership structures that worked early on can start to crack. That’s where proactive leadership development and risk mitigation go hand-in-hand. The Leadership Gap Is a Hidden Business Risk According to a recent CPHR Alberta report, talent development and leadership gaps remain one of the top five organizational risks (CPHR Alberta, 2023). The consequences are rarely immediate, but they compound over time: • Missed growth opportunities • High-potential employees leaving due to lack of career clarity • Poor team morale when unprepared managers struggle to lead • Strategic drift from lack of alignment at the top A growing company without a leadership pipeline is like a car without a spare tire, it might keep rolling, but one unexpected bump can send the whole operation into a tailspin. Risk Mitigation Starts with Leadership Insight The first step in mitigating leadership risk is to move from guesswork to clarity. That means using structured tools like leadership assessments, succession planning frameworks, and targeted coaching to surface the actual capabilities of current and emerging leaders. In professional services firms, for example, it’s common to see technically strong employees promoted into management roles. While they excel in their areas of expertise, they often lack key leadership capabilities like delegation, feedback, and emotional intelligence (Gallo, 2016). Without proper development, this can lead to stalled projects, disengaged teams, and higher turnover. Leadership assessments and focused coaching are essential to identify these gaps early and build the skills needed to lead effectively. Common Leadership Risks in SMBs Every organization faces different risks, but these are some of the most common leadership vulnerabilities seen in growth-stage companies (SHRM, 2022): • Lack of succession planning: Only one person knows how to run a key function, creating bottlenecks and burnout. • Unclear decision-making authority: Teams waste time waiting for approvals or duplicating efforts due to ambiguous roles. • Promotion without preparation: High performers are promoted into leadership roles without training, leading to micromanagement or misalignment. • Poor feedback culture: A lack of honest dialogue means small issues snowball into bigger people problems. • Leadership misfit: A leader’s natural style may clash with the culture or needs of a specific team or situation. Mitigating these risks requires more than a one-time workshop. It takes intentional development, structured tools, and reinforcement over time (SHRM, 2022). What Effective Mitigation Looks Like The most successful companies don’t wait for a leadership crisis to take action. They build leadership strength proactively. Here’s what that looks like: • Leadership assessments are used during hiring and promotions to identify fit, style, and potential blind spots. • Customized coaching programs help leaders build the exact skills they need in real time, tied to their actual challenges (International Coaching Federation, 2022). • Leadership training cohorts (such as PowerUp Leadership’s “Coaching Skills for Managers” or “Authentic Leadership” programs) create a shared foundation across the organization. • Succession maps identify who is ready or could be ready for key roles in 12–24 months, creating a proactive development plan (SHRM, 2022). As companies grow, the complexity of people management increases exponentially. Systems, tools, and strategy all matter but none of them work without effective leadership behind them (McKinsey & Company, 2018). Investing in leadership development isn’t a “nice to have” for big companies, it’s a risk management strategy for every business serious about sustainable growth. 
MORE NEWS