The Power of Numbers

23
Jan 2023
227
A yellow tape measure is measuring a small plant in the soil.

Author: Aneesha Ugwoke (she/her) 

In my first blog, I talk about my workplace culture that encourages safe and brave spaces.  Here, vulnerable conversations created awareness and education through “desired discomfort”.  However, anecdotal proclamations don’t solely reflect behavioral changes.  One also needs data, scientific evidence of current state.

A plant with roots and leaves is shown with the words diversity belonging and equity and inclusion.

Believing that celebrating data focused only on your recruitment efforts into junior roles is an accomplishment is a misnomer.  I’m not suggesting not to hire diverse employees into these jobs.  I’m underscoring the importance of equity and inclusion as the focal point of your efforts to produce diversity and sense of belonging as inevitable outcomes at ALL levels of the organization.  Because here’s the thing:  what separates the company who is “tick-boxing” their DEI efforts from the one who is leading it is the ‘what, why, where, who, when, and how’ they pull their data. 


Okay, multiple choice question time.  Which statement is true?

A) Sound decisions are data driven.  If I don’t know where I am, I won’t know where I’m going.

B) Poor decisions are data driven.  Data doesn’t give me the right answers to all my problems.



You need to know where you are to select the right path forward.  And measuring DEI is a balance of both qualitative and quantitative data to be effective.  So, both statements are true.  

However, sound decisions come from meaningful data.  

“Meaningful data:  data that explores the whole truth and seeks to transform the system”.

We see ways to translate good intentions into systemic equity as a three-pronged approach:

A) Attraction

- Ubiquitous to others, we know that senior and executive leadership look homogenous.  We have a goal that transparently addresses the gap so that we have meaningful outcomes by 2025.

- Data that measures the success rates from various targeted sources including BIPOC communities and institutions.

- Data that unveils IF a self-identifying diverse individual was considered and WHY they were not hired, as applicable.

- A dashboard that publicly displays our current state and our goals.  

- Hopes for the future:

​- Leader-led annual reports that showcase their own hiring results.  Broken down by division, business unit, and the manager could really be the visual aid that catalyzes ownership and any necessary support.

B) Retention

- Augment internal movement analytics with turnover stats.  

- Track mentees and formalized individual development plans so that there is awareness outside of the individual’s business unit.

- Build internal mobility into the overall dashboard and compare data to last fiscal to reflect and project.

- Analyze all existing pay disparities.

- Hopes for the future:

​- Talent map to fill gaps, project, and plan.  The plan includes succession opportunities, coaching opportunities, and accountability.

- Utilize statistical data to draw conclusions.  An example of that would be that your data reporting uncovers an employee who has applied to numerous roles and failed.  This is a gift to dig deeper into the why and provide needed support accordingly.

C) Engagement

- As an organization, you already have objectives that measure employee experiences through various engagement drivers.  Augment this by setting a belonging index where value is expressed directly from underserved employees.

- Because results from survey scores

​- don’t give the ‘why’

- can present results that don’t capture feelings of the entire underrepresented population in the organization 

- supplement the data with focus group discussions and ad hoc surveys that ask intentional questions to get more chunks of the entire picture.  

- Hopes for the future:

​- Even though surveys are developed based on industry best practices, the composition of the industry is still dominated by privileged individuals.  Think about how to use your marginalized employees as collaborators.  Perhaps they can provide feedback on the questions being asked about their own engagement to create a truly decolonized survey.

The most important takeaway is that measuring data on the organization’s DEI maturity is an iterative effort over time.  That’s both good news and cause for caution.  The aging process gives hope and ensures that there’s thought and quality in the execution.  Conversely, time can also pave the way for competing priorities to eclipse continuous traction on DEI percolation.  To combat this, continuous consultation support from a third party could help.

In conclusion, there IS power in numbers.  It’s not the only crutch to aid in decision-making but it’s an integral one.  

With pure intention, continuous curiosity, and fact checking with data we aspire to do better and be better.  



About the Author:  Aneesha Ugwoke (she/her) is currently a leader with Farm Credit Canada, CPHR Alberta member, and an anti-racism specialist.  



The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Jessica Jaithoo August 26, 2025
Author : Veronica Flores, CPHR, Wood Buffalo Chapter In the fast-paced world of HR, we often talk about unconscious bias, diversity, and inclusion. But one subtle form of bias that continues to shape workplace dynamics, often without us realizing it, is the halo effect . The halo effect, as outlined in Canadian Organizational Behaviour by McShane, Steen, and Tasa, is a perceptual bias where our overall impression of someone, often shaped by a single trait, influences how we judge their other qualities. I experienced the halo effect in a way that has stayed with me ever since. As someone who immigrated to Canada from a vibrant Latino community, I brought with me not only my culture and language but also a strong set of personal values: dedication to excellence, deep respect for others, and a belief in the power of organization and continuous improvement. Over the years, I've built a life in Canada and grown professionally. One thing my colleagues quickly noticed? I’m extremely organized—my files are color-coded, I like to automate tasks and improve processes, and I genuinely believe that a tidy environment leads to a clear mind. But one day, that very strength—my love for order—became the only lens through which someone saw me, and not in the way I expected. Our team was switching workstations, and I noticed a new coworker, someone from a different cultural background, standing near their new desk, not quite settling in. I casually asked if they had moved in yet, and they replied, “I’m just waiting for you to clean it first.”  At first, I laughed, thinking it was a joke. But their expression stayed serious. That’s when it hit me: they had assumed I was there to clean their desk. Why? Because I’m Latina? Because I’m tidy? Because I was organizing my own space? I simply showed them where the cleaning supplies were and walked away. But the moment stayed with me, not just because it was uncomfortable, but because it revealed something deeper about how we perceive each other at work. Later, I opened up to another coworker about what had happened. She shared a story of her own: because she is from China, a colleague once asked her to perform acupuncture or massage their neck, assuming she must know traditional Chinese medicine. She was just as stunned as I had been. These assumptions weren’t rooted in malice, but they were rooted in stereotypes. And they show how the halo effect, when combined with cultural bias, can lead to reductive and even offensive conclusions. The Hidden Cost of Snap Judgments The halo effect doesn’t always manifest in such overt ways. Sometimes, it’s as subtle as assuming a soft-spoken employee lacks leadership potential or that someone who struggles with English isn’t as intelligent. These assumptions can influence hiring decisions, performance evaluations, and even day-to-day interactions. For HR professionals, the implications are significant. When we allow the halo effect to guide our perceptions, we risk reinforcing stereotypes and limiting opportunities for others. Worse, we may unknowingly create environments where people feel unseen or misjudged. Strategies to Counter the Halo Effect Here are a few practical ways HR professionals can help reduce the impact of the halo effect in their organizations: Get to know people beyond the surface. Take time to learn about your coworkers’ skills, experiences, and goals. Be mindful of cultural assumptions. Just because someone is from a particular background doesn’t mean they fit a cultural stereotype. Create space for conversations. Sharing stories, like the ones my coworker and I exchanged, can build empathy and awareness. Focus on inclusion, not just diversity. It’s not enough to have different people in the room. We need to ensure everyone is seen and valued for who they truly are. The halo effect reminds us that perception is powerful, but not always accurate. That day in the office reminded me that even positive traits can be misinterpreted when viewed through the wrong lens. And that inclusion means more than just being present; it means being seen clearly. So, as an HR professional, ask yourself: Are you seeing your coworkers for who they really are, or just through the halo of a single trait?
By Jessica Jaithoo August 8, 2025
Author : Nicole Mahieux, Nick Canning & Kendal Tremblay Mental health is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of employee well-being, business resilience and community strength. For HR professionals, supporting mental health is no longer optional—it’s imperative. While conversations around mental health have gained traction in many industries, one critical sector still faces unique and persistent challenges: agriculture. Farmers and agricultural workers play a vital role in food production and national food security. Yet they are among the most vulnerable when it comes to mental health struggles. In fact, they experience some of the highest rates of stress, anxiety, depression—and even suicide. This is not just a personal issue. It's a workforce issue. It's a public health issue. It's a business issue. There are a range of compounding pressures makes farming one of the most mentally taxing professions.  These include: 1.Financial Stress & Unpredictability Unstable markets, weather-dependent outcomes, and shifting government policies contribute to a constant sense of economic uncertainty. 2. Isolation Many farmers work alone and live in rural areas where access to social support is limited. Social isolation increases vulnerability to mental health concerns. 3. Stigma Although mental health stigma is slowly decreasing, it remains a barrier—especially among men, who represent 74% of the agricultural workforce. Traditional gender norms often discourage open conversations or help-seeking.
By Jessica Jaithoo August 7, 2025
As a proud participant in the Glowing Hearts program , CPHR Alberta continues to champion the value that Canadian Armed Forces reservists bring to our workplaces. Since joining the program, we’ve seen firsthand how supporting reservists not only strengthens our communities but also enhances organizational resilience and leadership. The Value of Reservists in the Workplace Reservists are more than military personnel—they are strategic thinkers, adaptable leaders, and skilled collaborators. Their training equips them with discipline, problem-solving abilities, and a mission-focused mindset that translates seamlessly into civilian roles. Captain McKenzie Kibler of The Loyal Edmonton Regiment exemplifies this. In a recent deployment on Operation REASSURANCE, he developed leadership and operational skills that now enrich his civilian career. Watch his story here. Support, Recognition, and Incentives for Employers Supporting reservists doesn’t mean sacrificing business continuity—in fact, it opens the door to meaningful recognition and financial support. Through the Compensation for Employers of Reservists Program (CERP) , employers can receive grants to help offset operational costs when a reservist-employee is away for 30 days or more. At the same time, organizations that register their reservist leave policies with the Glowing Hearts program are publicly recognized on the Canadian Forces Liaison Council website and receive a certificate of support and digital badge. These benefits not only ease the logistical challenges of supporting reservists but also position your organization as a leader in community engagement and national service. Tools and Templates for HR Leaders To make it easier for organizations to support reservists, CPHR Alberta offers a Reservist Leave Policy Template. This resource outlines eligibility, leave procedures, compensation, and compliance with federal and provincial legislation—making it simple to implement a supportive policy. Access the template through the Member Portal.
MORE NEWS