Getting to the Bottom of Complaints: Our Step-by-Step Process
24
Aug 2023
216
Author
: Erica Blain, Director, Professional Standards, Registrar, CPHR Alberta
CPHR Alberta is the professional association for Chartered HR Professionals in Alberta. Registered members of our association are subject to the Complaints and Discipline Process as a way to ensure safety to the public. HR professionals have considerable influence over the policies, processes and practices employed by organizations across Alberta which affects how almost all Albertans are treated in the workplace. As a result of this influence, it is important that HR professionals are held accountable for their decisions and advice. The Complaints and Discipline process at CPHR Alberta exists so that members of the public have an avenue to share concerns, queries, and complaints about the Human Resources professionals in their organizations.
When a member of the public reaches out to CPHR Alberta with a complaint, the first thing that needs to be ascertained is whether or not a complaint is sound. Sound complaints are:
- Based upon facts and have good supporting documentation.
- Seem to be the result of the HR professional’s decision-making.
- Clearly indicate that the CPHR Alberta Code of Ethics or Standards of Professional Practice may have been breached.
Complaints may not be sound for a handful of reasons:
- The complainant has very little documentation or evidence to support the claim being made;
- The HR Professional was clearly not the decision maker in the issue at hand and therefore cannot be held accountable;
- The only complaint is that someone was released from a role without cause and the process followed appropriate legislation.
The most common types of complaints CPHR Alberta receives that are found to be sound and are therefore investigated, involve one or more of the following:
- Breach of confidentiality of sorts by the HR professional
- Concerns with an HR Professional’s expertise and ability in carrying out an investigation or other process
- Concerns about bias, prejudice or conflict of interest when hiring, recruiting or disciplining
- Insufficient concern by an HR Professional for employee’s mental wellbeing
- Violation of Alberta Employment Standards for pay or overtime
- Harassment
Any concern that an HR Professional has violated the Code of Ethics or Standards of Professional Practice should be reported to CPHR Alberta.
Process Overview
When a complaint is sent in by a member of the public, CPHR Alberta follows the below process.
- CPHR Alberta receives a complaint and checks for soundness and completeness.
- If the complaint is sound and complete, the HR Professional is notified of the complaint and asked to respond.
- Once CPHR Alberta has both the complaint and response, the Discipline Committee reviews and makes a decision to dismiss or move to an investigation.
- Parties are offered Alternative Dispute Resolution and if declined, an investigation takes place.
- Once an investigation is completed and the Investigation Report is compiled, the Chair of the Discipline Committee decides whether the Code of Ethics was breached or not.
- If an HR Professional is found to have breached the Code of Ethics or Standards of Professional Practice, they are referred to a Discipline Hearing where they are given a discipline order.
Dismissal of Complaints
While some complaints are founded and the HR Professional in question is disciplined as required, some complaints are also dismissed. There are a variety of reasons a complaint may be dismissed.
One is that a complaint may not be valid, meaning that the complaint being made does not have a strong basis in fact. This could include someone complaining that they were let go without cause and they didn’t think they deserved to be let go.
Another reason a complaint is dismissed is because it is apparent the complainant is making the complaint because they are upset but that there is no actual complaint. This might look like someone who is angry for losing a job and is now stating that the HR professional broke every part of the code, violated the Human Rights Act and the Alberta Employment Standards but there is no evidence that any of the accusations are based in reality.
A trivial complaint will also be dismissed. A trivial complaint is minor in nature and is lacking in evidence. The committee will not notify the respondent that this complaint was filed but will keep it on record in case similar complaints against the same individual are submitted.
Outcomes of Complaints
When a complaint is valid, sound and not vexatious and then, through an investigation by the Committee, is also founded, the HR professional will face discipline.
CPHR Alberta is not currently a self-regulated association, and so there is a limitation in the power given to the Discipline Committee regarding orders that can be determined.
CPHR Alberta cannot:
- Force an organization to re-hire someone who was fired, laid off or let go without cause
- Reward damages to the complainant
- Financially punish the respondent
CPHR Alberta can:
- Recommend or enforce further education for the professional to prevent future violations of a similar nature.
- Require that specific courses be completed in order to better understand ethics, legal issues and other rules that HR professionals must follow.
- Suspend or revoke the CPHR designation of the HR professional who violated the Code of Ethics
- Revoke membership with CPHR Alberta
The CPHR Alberta Discipline Committee exists to investigate complaints from the public to ensure that our Chartered Members are following the Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice to which they have agreed.
If you wish to file a complaint against an HR Professional in Alberta, please visit our website here
for more details.
The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.
Author : Nicole Mahieux, Nick Canning & Kendal Tremblay Mental health is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of employee well-being, business resilience and community strength. For HR professionals, supporting mental health is no longer optional—it’s imperative. While conversations around mental health have gained traction in many industries, one critical sector still faces unique and persistent challenges: agriculture. Farmers and agricultural workers play a vital role in food production and national food security. Yet they are among the most vulnerable when it comes to mental health struggles. In fact, they experience some of the highest rates of stress, anxiety, depression—and even suicide. This is not just a personal issue. It's a workforce issue. It's a public health issue. It's a business issue. There are a range of compounding pressures makes farming one of the most mentally taxing professions. These include: 1.Financial Stress & Unpredictability Unstable markets, weather-dependent outcomes, and shifting government policies contribute to a constant sense of economic uncertainty. 2. Isolation Many farmers work alone and live in rural areas where access to social support is limited. Social isolation increases vulnerability to mental health concerns. 3. Stigma Although mental health stigma is slowly decreasing, it remains a barrier—especially among men, who represent 74% of the agricultural workforce. Traditional gender norms often discourage open conversations or help-seeking.
As a proud participant in the Glowing Hearts program , CPHR Alberta continues to champion the value that Canadian Armed Forces reservists bring to our workplaces. Since joining the program, we’ve seen firsthand how supporting reservists not only strengthens our communities but also enhances organizational resilience and leadership. The Value of Reservists in the Workplace Reservists are more than military personnel—they are strategic thinkers, adaptable leaders, and skilled collaborators. Their training equips them with discipline, problem-solving abilities, and a mission-focused mindset that translates seamlessly into civilian roles. Captain McKenzie Kibler of The Loyal Edmonton Regiment exemplifies this. In a recent deployment on Operation REASSURANCE, he developed leadership and operational skills that now enrich his civilian career. Watch his story here. Support, Recognition, and Incentives for Employers Supporting reservists doesn’t mean sacrificing business continuity—in fact, it opens the door to meaningful recognition and financial support. Through the Compensation for Employers of Reservists Program (CERP) , employers can receive grants to help offset operational costs when a reservist-employee is away for 30 days or more. At the same time, organizations that register their reservist leave policies with the Glowing Hearts program are publicly recognized on the Canadian Forces Liaison Council website and receive a certificate of support and digital badge. These benefits not only ease the logistical challenges of supporting reservists but also position your organization as a leader in community engagement and national service. Tools and Templates for HR Leaders To make it easier for organizations to support reservists, CPHR Alberta offers a Reservist Leave Policy Template. This resource outlines eligibility, leave procedures, compensation, and compliance with federal and provincial legislation—making it simple to implement a supportive policy. Access the template through the Member Portal.
Companies that invest in leadership development see real returns. According to Brandon Hall Group, organizations with strong leadership development programs are 1.5 times more likely to be financially high-performing, reinforcing the clear connection between leadership strength and business success (Brandon Hall Group, 2015). For small to mid-sized businesses, this risk can be especially high. As teams expand and complexity increases, the informal leadership structures that worked early on can start to crack. That’s where proactive leadership development and risk mitigation go hand-in-hand. The Leadership Gap Is a Hidden Business Risk According to a recent CPHR Alberta report, talent development and leadership gaps remain one of the top five organizational risks (CPHR Alberta, 2023). The consequences are rarely immediate, but they compound over time: • Missed growth opportunities • High-potential employees leaving due to lack of career clarity • Poor team morale when unprepared managers struggle to lead • Strategic drift from lack of alignment at the top A growing company without a leadership pipeline is like a car without a spare tire, it might keep rolling, but one unexpected bump can send the whole operation into a tailspin. Risk Mitigation Starts with Leadership Insight The first step in mitigating leadership risk is to move from guesswork to clarity. That means using structured tools like leadership assessments, succession planning frameworks, and targeted coaching to surface the actual capabilities of current and emerging leaders. In professional services firms, for example, it’s common to see technically strong employees promoted into management roles. While they excel in their areas of expertise, they often lack key leadership capabilities like delegation, feedback, and emotional intelligence (Gallo, 2016). Without proper development, this can lead to stalled projects, disengaged teams, and higher turnover. Leadership assessments and focused coaching are essential to identify these gaps early and build the skills needed to lead effectively. Common Leadership Risks in SMBs Every organization faces different risks, but these are some of the most common leadership vulnerabilities seen in growth-stage companies (SHRM, 2022): • Lack of succession planning: Only one person knows how to run a key function, creating bottlenecks and burnout. • Unclear decision-making authority: Teams waste time waiting for approvals or duplicating efforts due to ambiguous roles. • Promotion without preparation: High performers are promoted into leadership roles without training, leading to micromanagement or misalignment. • Poor feedback culture: A lack of honest dialogue means small issues snowball into bigger people problems. • Leadership misfit: A leader’s natural style may clash with the culture or needs of a specific team or situation. Mitigating these risks requires more than a one-time workshop. It takes intentional development, structured tools, and reinforcement over time (SHRM, 2022). What Effective Mitigation Looks Like The most successful companies don’t wait for a leadership crisis to take action. They build leadership strength proactively. Here’s what that looks like: • Leadership assessments are used during hiring and promotions to identify fit, style, and potential blind spots. • Customized coaching programs help leaders build the exact skills they need in real time, tied to their actual challenges (International Coaching Federation, 2022). • Leadership training cohorts (such as PowerUp Leadership’s “Coaching Skills for Managers” or “Authentic Leadership” programs) create a shared foundation across the organization. • Succession maps identify who is ready or could be ready for key roles in 12–24 months, creating a proactive development plan (SHRM, 2022). As companies grow, the complexity of people management increases exponentially. Systems, tools, and strategy all matter but none of them work without effective leadership behind them (McKinsey & Company, 2018). Investing in leadership development isn’t a “nice to have” for big companies, it’s a risk management strategy for every business serious about sustainable growth.
