Follow to lead - part 1

23
Jun 2023
275
A group of paper airplanes are flying up in the air.

Author: Aneesha Ugwoke (she/her) is currently a leader with Farm Credit Canada, CPHR Alberta member, and an anti-racism specialist. 

At FCC, our leaders are truly the secret sauce to inward and outward success because they are genuinely people-centric.  As we ebb and flow through our DEI efforts, I see HR professionals and leaders navigate and drive respectively (as we should). 

When I think about impacts, the ‘ shoulds ’ compel me to challenge my own inclusive leadership.  I’ve come to experience success in followership when leading those who have different lived experiences than me because they challenge me to seek solutions that are unprecedented or don’t fit current paradigms. 

Rather than directing, I’m being directed by those who seek equity.

Certainly, to let followership ensue, you must:

A diagram that says ask about impact think outside follow their lead

These approaches may seem obtuse, but that’s assuming that we all have the same experiences and needs, which is simply untrue.  To operate more effectively with those who aren’t like us, w e need to reassert and redeploy our humanness.    We need to feel more un-stuck from the rut of not knowing ‘how-to’.  Ultimately, as leaders and HR professionals, we need to raise the bar so that felt change inevitably leads to tangible change.   



WE NEED TO ASK THOSE WHO MATTER.



Here’s another ‘ should’ :  When making DEI decisions that impact the system, should we uphold business outcomes or employee experience?  I’d ask you to first consider why it must be an either/or question.  Compare this to the chicken and egg parable.  Reflect on external impacts created by followership to vendors, potential future employees, customers, and competitors versus enclosed internal impacts only.

At the risk of sounding offensive…at times, could the business and policies be excuses to the real roadblock; you? 

In other words, I don’t ask to call you out but to draw you in to remind you of your good intent and goal.

You have an employee who is asking for an allowance that isn’t within the parameter of that policy.  Do you grant an exception, help identify the inequity, or decline with a soft alternative?

How do you tackle a choice between hiring for diversity and hiring for inclusivity; or hiring for skill vs experience; or hiring for the almighty Canadian experience? 

Are there decisions that you could make that help you pilot an unprecedented initiative? (So that you tackle your fear of going into unchartered territory carefully and make thoughtful decisions that have been tested?)

Is it possible to seek partnerships with other leaders who could be on a hiring panel with you so that your biases can be challenged?

Could you talk about allyship intermittently in your team meetings? 

Are your surveys giving you the entire picture, or are they responses to the few questions you asked?  The responses could be true and valid but represent only a small bite of the entire pie.

Is it reasonable to offer flexible hours to someone participating in fasting or someone who cannot afford or find childcare easily? 

Do you offer advice that doesn’t resonate with someone who practices a lifestyle with cultural nuances?  50-50 households are not ubiquitous to all cultures, all households, all women.  In my culture, you do marry the family and sometimes live with them in the same house.  In my case, sympathy for upholding all responsibilities devalues my culture, my values. 

Undoubtedly, support is being offered.  And to level up, employee assistance programs don’t cater to all needs.  Through no fault of those case workers, services aren’t expansive enough for all needs.  The case workers themselves don’t resonate with struggles that are particular to identities  This isn’t because they lack expertise but because they may not have the same lived experience as others from more diverse backgrounds.

For followership to prevail, I’m not suggesting that you let others make important decisions that you were hired for.   Instead, let’s keep that individual’s success in mind as the north star, your decisions will inevitably illustrate your authenticity and enable trust for inclusivity. 

Luckily, these are the perpendicular and parallel synergies of leaders and HR professionals that I get to watch daily.  



BUT EVEN GREATNESS CAN BE ELEVATED.



The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Jessica Jaithoo August 8, 2025
Author : Nicole Mahieux, Nick Canning & Kendal Tremblay Mental health is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of employee well-being, business resilience and community strength. For HR professionals, supporting mental health is no longer optional—it’s imperative. While conversations around mental health have gained traction in many industries, one critical sector still faces unique and persistent challenges: agriculture. Farmers and agricultural workers play a vital role in food production and national food security. Yet they are among the most vulnerable when it comes to mental health struggles. In fact, they experience some of the highest rates of stress, anxiety, depression—and even suicide. This is not just a personal issue. It's a workforce issue. It's a public health issue. It's a business issue. There are a range of compounding pressures makes farming one of the most mentally taxing professions.  These include: 1.Financial Stress & Unpredictability Unstable markets, weather-dependent outcomes, and shifting government policies contribute to a constant sense of economic uncertainty. 2. Isolation Many farmers work alone and live in rural areas where access to social support is limited. Social isolation increases vulnerability to mental health concerns. 3. Stigma Although mental health stigma is slowly decreasing, it remains a barrier—especially among men, who represent 74% of the agricultural workforce. Traditional gender norms often discourage open conversations or help-seeking.
By Jessica Jaithoo August 7, 2025
As a proud participant in the Glowing Hearts program , CPHR Alberta continues to champion the value that Canadian Armed Forces reservists bring to our workplaces. Since joining the program, we’ve seen firsthand how supporting reservists not only strengthens our communities but also enhances organizational resilience and leadership. The Value of Reservists in the Workplace Reservists are more than military personnel—they are strategic thinkers, adaptable leaders, and skilled collaborators. Their training equips them with discipline, problem-solving abilities, and a mission-focused mindset that translates seamlessly into civilian roles. Captain McKenzie Kibler of The Loyal Edmonton Regiment exemplifies this. In a recent deployment on Operation REASSURANCE, he developed leadership and operational skills that now enrich his civilian career. Watch his story here. Support, Recognition, and Incentives for Employers Supporting reservists doesn’t mean sacrificing business continuity—in fact, it opens the door to meaningful recognition and financial support. Through the Compensation for Employers of Reservists Program (CERP) , employers can receive grants to help offset operational costs when a reservist-employee is away for 30 days or more. At the same time, organizations that register their reservist leave policies with the Glowing Hearts program are publicly recognized on the Canadian Forces Liaison Council website and receive a certificate of support and digital badge. These benefits not only ease the logistical challenges of supporting reservists but also position your organization as a leader in community engagement and national service. Tools and Templates for HR Leaders To make it easier for organizations to support reservists, CPHR Alberta offers a Reservist Leave Policy Template. This resource outlines eligibility, leave procedures, compensation, and compliance with federal and provincial legislation—making it simple to implement a supportive policy. Access the template through the Member Portal.
By Marina Perkovic July 29, 2025
Companies that invest in leadership development see real returns. According to Brandon Hall Group, organizations with strong leadership development programs are 1.5 times more likely to be financially high-performing, reinforcing the clear connection between leadership strength and business success (Brandon Hall Group, 2015). For small to mid-sized businesses, this risk can be especially high. As teams expand and complexity increases, the informal leadership structures that worked early on can start to crack. That’s where proactive leadership development and risk mitigation go hand-in-hand. The Leadership Gap Is a Hidden Business Risk According to a recent CPHR Alberta report, talent development and leadership gaps remain one of the top five organizational risks (CPHR Alberta, 2023). The consequences are rarely immediate, but they compound over time: • Missed growth opportunities • High-potential employees leaving due to lack of career clarity • Poor team morale when unprepared managers struggle to lead • Strategic drift from lack of alignment at the top A growing company without a leadership pipeline is like a car without a spare tire, it might keep rolling, but one unexpected bump can send the whole operation into a tailspin. Risk Mitigation Starts with Leadership Insight The first step in mitigating leadership risk is to move from guesswork to clarity. That means using structured tools like leadership assessments, succession planning frameworks, and targeted coaching to surface the actual capabilities of current and emerging leaders. In professional services firms, for example, it’s common to see technically strong employees promoted into management roles. While they excel in their areas of expertise, they often lack key leadership capabilities like delegation, feedback, and emotional intelligence (Gallo, 2016). Without proper development, this can lead to stalled projects, disengaged teams, and higher turnover. Leadership assessments and focused coaching are essential to identify these gaps early and build the skills needed to lead effectively. Common Leadership Risks in SMBs Every organization faces different risks, but these are some of the most common leadership vulnerabilities seen in growth-stage companies (SHRM, 2022): • Lack of succession planning: Only one person knows how to run a key function, creating bottlenecks and burnout. • Unclear decision-making authority: Teams waste time waiting for approvals or duplicating efforts due to ambiguous roles. • Promotion without preparation: High performers are promoted into leadership roles without training, leading to micromanagement or misalignment. • Poor feedback culture: A lack of honest dialogue means small issues snowball into bigger people problems. • Leadership misfit: A leader’s natural style may clash with the culture or needs of a specific team or situation. Mitigating these risks requires more than a one-time workshop. It takes intentional development, structured tools, and reinforcement over time (SHRM, 2022). What Effective Mitigation Looks Like The most successful companies don’t wait for a leadership crisis to take action. They build leadership strength proactively. Here’s what that looks like: • Leadership assessments are used during hiring and promotions to identify fit, style, and potential blind spots. • Customized coaching programs help leaders build the exact skills they need in real time, tied to their actual challenges (International Coaching Federation, 2022). • Leadership training cohorts (such as PowerUp Leadership’s “Coaching Skills for Managers” or “Authentic Leadership” programs) create a shared foundation across the organization. • Succession maps identify who is ready or could be ready for key roles in 12–24 months, creating a proactive development plan (SHRM, 2022). As companies grow, the complexity of people management increases exponentially. Systems, tools, and strategy all matter but none of them work without effective leadership behind them (McKinsey & Company, 2018). Investing in leadership development isn’t a “nice to have” for big companies, it’s a risk management strategy for every business serious about sustainable growth. 
MORE NEWS