Follow to lead - part 1

23
Jun 2023
275
A group of paper airplanes are flying up in the air.

Author: Aneesha Ugwoke (she/her) is currently a leader with Farm Credit Canada, CPHR Alberta member, and an anti-racism specialist. 

At FCC, our leaders are truly the secret sauce to inward and outward success because they are genuinely people-centric.  As we ebb and flow through our DEI efforts, I see HR professionals and leaders navigate and drive respectively (as we should). 

When I think about impacts, the ‘ shoulds ’ compel me to challenge my own inclusive leadership.  I’ve come to experience success in followership when leading those who have different lived experiences than me because they challenge me to seek solutions that are unprecedented or don’t fit current paradigms. 

Rather than directing, I’m being directed by those who seek equity.

Certainly, to let followership ensue, you must:

A diagram that says ask about impact think outside follow their lead

These approaches may seem obtuse, but that’s assuming that we all have the same experiences and needs, which is simply untrue.  To operate more effectively with those who aren’t like us, w e need to reassert and redeploy our humanness.    We need to feel more un-stuck from the rut of not knowing ‘how-to’.  Ultimately, as leaders and HR professionals, we need to raise the bar so that felt change inevitably leads to tangible change.   



WE NEED TO ASK THOSE WHO MATTER.



Here’s another ‘ should’ :  When making DEI decisions that impact the system, should we uphold business outcomes or employee experience?  I’d ask you to first consider why it must be an either/or question.  Compare this to the chicken and egg parable.  Reflect on external impacts created by followership to vendors, potential future employees, customers, and competitors versus enclosed internal impacts only.

At the risk of sounding offensive…at times, could the business and policies be excuses to the real roadblock; you? 

In other words, I don’t ask to call you out but to draw you in to remind you of your good intent and goal.

You have an employee who is asking for an allowance that isn’t within the parameter of that policy.  Do you grant an exception, help identify the inequity, or decline with a soft alternative?

How do you tackle a choice between hiring for diversity and hiring for inclusivity; or hiring for skill vs experience; or hiring for the almighty Canadian experience? 

Are there decisions that you could make that help you pilot an unprecedented initiative? (So that you tackle your fear of going into unchartered territory carefully and make thoughtful decisions that have been tested?)

Is it possible to seek partnerships with other leaders who could be on a hiring panel with you so that your biases can be challenged?

Could you talk about allyship intermittently in your team meetings? 

Are your surveys giving you the entire picture, or are they responses to the few questions you asked?  The responses could be true and valid but represent only a small bite of the entire pie.

Is it reasonable to offer flexible hours to someone participating in fasting or someone who cannot afford or find childcare easily? 

Do you offer advice that doesn’t resonate with someone who practices a lifestyle with cultural nuances?  50-50 households are not ubiquitous to all cultures, all households, all women.  In my culture, you do marry the family and sometimes live with them in the same house.  In my case, sympathy for upholding all responsibilities devalues my culture, my values. 

Undoubtedly, support is being offered.  And to level up, employee assistance programs don’t cater to all needs.  Through no fault of those case workers, services aren’t expansive enough for all needs.  The case workers themselves don’t resonate with struggles that are particular to identities  This isn’t because they lack expertise but because they may not have the same lived experience as others from more diverse backgrounds.

For followership to prevail, I’m not suggesting that you let others make important decisions that you were hired for.   Instead, let’s keep that individual’s success in mind as the north star, your decisions will inevitably illustrate your authenticity and enable trust for inclusivity. 

Luckily, these are the perpendicular and parallel synergies of leaders and HR professionals that I get to watch daily.  



BUT EVEN GREATNESS CAN BE ELEVATED.



The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Jessica Jaithoo September 29, 2025
Author: Ada Tai, MBA, CPHR, SHRM-SCP I’ve been watching the pace of corporate restructuring accelerate this year, and it’s striking how no sector seems immune. ConocoPhillips is reducing its global workforce by a quarter. Intel is preparing to slash 24,000 jobs in one of the largest shake-ups in its history. Salesforce is eliminating 4,000 positions as it doubles down on its AI strategy. Paramount Skydance, fresh off its blockbuster merger, is shedding up to 3,000 roles; while Hudson’s Bay, a retailer that’s been part of Canada’s identity for more than 350 years, is closing its doors and letting go of more than 8,300 employees. Add to that layoffs at Starbucks, Amazon, PwC, Burberry and even Recruit Holdings, the parent company of Indeed and Glassdoor 1 , and the picture becomes clear: we’re in the middle of a global restructuring storm, where technology, cost pressures, and shifting markets are re-writing the rules of work. In my recent conversations with business leaders, one theme keeps surfacing: many are contemplating a restructuring of their own. However, they’re not just looking to cut costs; they’re seeking a clear strategy. That’s what this guide is about: how to prepare for restructuring with purpose, clarity, and humanity. Step One: Define the "Why" Restructuring is one of the most complex decisions a company can make. Done poorly, it can destabilize operations and damage culture. Done well, it can reset the business for future success. The starting point is always the “why.” What problems are you solving? Common drivers include: Financial distress - Reducing costs and/or improving profit margin to stabilize the business Market changes - Pivoting toward new products, services, or geographical territories Technology shifts - Re-organizing to adopt AI, automation, or other innovations Efficiency and competitiveness: Streamline structures or flatten hierarchies The objectives must be specific, measurable, and aligned with the company's long-term vision. This "why" is the foundation for the entire plan and is essential for communicating with stakeholders. Step Two: Define the “What” Once the purpose is clear, organizations can proceed to define the scope. Which functions are absolutely critical to preserve? And which areas could be restructured, consolidated, or phased out? This stage is about mapping priorities. In my work with clients, I often find that once they clarify their non-negotiables, the rest of the plan comes into focus much more easily. Step Three: Plan the “How” Too often, companies jump straight to layoffs, but effective restructuring requires scenario planning. Before jumping to layoffs, I’d advise businesses test different options to see which will lead to the best results for their company. This might include a hiring or salary freeze, reduced hours, offering voluntary exits, retraining employees, or re-deploying talent to new roles. Each option carries different financial, operational, and cultural impacts. Running these scenarios before making cuts prevents costly missteps.  Equally important: restructuring can’t be run by a single department in isolation. Organizations need a cross-functional team of leaders, supported where needed by external advisors who bring objectivity and specialized expertise.
By Jessica Jaithoo August 8, 2025
Author : Nicole Mahieux, Nick Canning & Kendal Tremblay Mental health is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of employee well-being, business resilience and community strength. For HR professionals, supporting mental health is no longer optional—it’s imperative. While conversations around mental health have gained traction in many industries, one critical sector still faces unique and persistent challenges: agriculture. Farmers and agricultural workers play a vital role in food production and national food security. Yet they are among the most vulnerable when it comes to mental health struggles. In fact, they experience some of the highest rates of stress, anxiety, depression—and even suicide. This is not just a personal issue. It's a workforce issue. It's a public health issue. It's a business issue. There are a range of compounding pressures makes farming one of the most mentally taxing professions.  These include: 1.Financial Stress & Unpredictability Unstable markets, weather-dependent outcomes, and shifting government policies contribute to a constant sense of economic uncertainty. 2. Isolation Many farmers work alone and live in rural areas where access to social support is limited. Social isolation increases vulnerability to mental health concerns. 3. Stigma Although mental health stigma is slowly decreasing, it remains a barrier—especially among men, who represent 74% of the agricultural workforce. Traditional gender norms often discourage open conversations or help-seeking.
By Jessica Jaithoo August 7, 2025
As a proud participant in the Glowing Hearts program , CPHR Alberta continues to champion the value that Canadian Armed Forces reservists bring to our workplaces. Since joining the program, we’ve seen firsthand how supporting reservists not only strengthens our communities but also enhances organizational resilience and leadership. The Value of Reservists in the Workplace Reservists are more than military personnel—they are strategic thinkers, adaptable leaders, and skilled collaborators. Their training equips them with discipline, problem-solving abilities, and a mission-focused mindset that translates seamlessly into civilian roles. Captain McKenzie Kibler of The Loyal Edmonton Regiment exemplifies this. In a recent deployment on Operation REASSURANCE, he developed leadership and operational skills that now enrich his civilian career. Watch his story here. Support, Recognition, and Incentives for Employers Supporting reservists doesn’t mean sacrificing business continuity—in fact, it opens the door to meaningful recognition and financial support. Through the Compensation for Employers of Reservists Program (CERP) , employers can receive grants to help offset operational costs when a reservist-employee is away for 30 days or more. At the same time, organizations that register their reservist leave policies with the Glowing Hearts program are publicly recognized on the Canadian Forces Liaison Council website and receive a certificate of support and digital badge. These benefits not only ease the logistical challenges of supporting reservists but also position your organization as a leader in community engagement and national service. Tools and Templates for HR Leaders To make it easier for organizations to support reservists, CPHR Alberta offers a Reservist Leave Policy Template. This resource outlines eligibility, leave procedures, compensation, and compliance with federal and provincial legislation—making it simple to implement a supportive policy. Access the template through the Member Portal.
MORE NEWS