The Connection Between DEI and Psychological Safety

26
Jul 2022
125
A silhouette of a man 's head in a blue circle on a black background.

Author : Lewis Glassey

What is Psychological Safety?

Psychological safety is the degree to which an individual feels safe to contribute without fear of being punished, embarrassed or criticized. It’s fundamental to team collaboration, our sense of belonging, our wellbeing and organizational performance.

As leaders increasingly look to create more diverse, respectful and inclusive workplaces, we’re finding many are becoming less confident. Leaders are feeling unsure how to support and strengthen individuals and team dynamics while simultaneously holding staff accountable and achieving strategic goals.

Open communication with your teammates does not result in a lack of accountability, it’s actually quite the opposite. A psychologically-safe workplace is where all members can give and receive feedback, contribute ideas, raise concerns and it is the key to building diverse, high-performing organizations.

Traditional leadership practices are not great at creating psychologically safe work environments. Leaders should instead  set the direction for a team and introduce accountability to ensure goals are being met. When leaders take their team’s needs into account and are able to sustainably perform at a high level, it is referred to as the accountability loop. There is an expectation that leaders simply know and understand how to strengthen and support teams without being taught.

We believe in a four-step, repeatable approach to leadership development:

  • Confirm direction - Ensure clarity, certainty, and alignment
  • Support Individuals - Promote fairness, recognition, and trust
  • Strengthen Team Dynamics - Build a team safety, comfort with risk, and acceptance of all team members; and
  • Build Accountability - The team can now focus on learning, catching, and coaching

Our Circular Leadership program gives leaders and teams a shared language and deliberate approach to sustainably build and support human-centric, high-performing workplaces.

Challenges Facing Successful DEI Initiatives

As companies increasingly recognize the performance benefits of more diverse and inclusive workplaces, it’s important that they track and respond as these concepts evolve over time.

For example, diversity was initially thought of as simply integrating people of different genders, faiths, ethnicities, and physical abilities into the workplace. As our understanding evolved, we learned to consider others’ experiences, identities and opinions. The most current iteration takes the previous ideas into account but recognizes that it’s also about tolerance, flexibility, choice and career purpose/progression. The expansion from a focus on just diversity to including, equity, inclusion and more recently belonging highlights these evolutions.

The challenge is that, without any way of understanding the needs of your workforce, it is difficult to drive meaningful action to achieve and maintain diversity targets.

When organizations are unable to see how their DEI initiatives impact their workforce, it is impossible to understand why these initiatives undermine collaboration, performance, innovation, customer satisfaction and staff retention. Decision-makers are hamstrung to make good decisions that positively improve the workplace experience and organizational performance.

As a result, strategies to increase diversity see short-term results with the very staff they are trying to attract leaving due to feeling excluded, unheard or under-valued.

Psychological Safety: The Key to an Effective DEI Strategy

Over the past six months, we have been doing a lot of work with clients measuring the relationship between psychological safety, DEI and its impact on organizational performance.

In every case, our results have revealed strong relationships (correlations) between psych safety and DEI. These results show that teams with elevated levels of psychological safety always or regularly:

  • Feel comfortable discussing women’s career development.
  • Discuss gender and ethnicity issues amongst their team and with their managers;
  • Experience better interactions between staff of diverse backgrounds; and
  • Feel more satisfied with how their organization handles diversity issues.

Teams that reported low levels of psychological safety, on the other hand, reported rarely or never to each of the above.

For one client, who had committed to increasing diversity in their workforce, they discovered staff with low levels of psychological safety were 43% more likely to leave the organization, with women being 71% more likely to leave than their male counterparts. In a tight labour market, servicing the revolving door of staff leaving was dramatically impacting staff morale, business growth and product development.

Implementing a DEI strategy that does not incorporate psych safety is lose-lose-lose for the people in your workforce, your organization’s performance, and greater society.

The Takeaway:

Where psychological safety is low, staff feel unwilling or unable to discuss DEI issues with fellow staff members or management.

Employers who focus on DEI topics but ignore the psychological safety of their teams put their organization at risk of higher turnover, reduced performance, low innovation and have a lower likelihood of change initiatives succeeding.

The good news is that employers who recognize psych safety as a foundation piece to achieving DEI targets can intentionally and sustainably build high-performing, human-centric workplaces.


 

About the Author: 

Written by Lewis Glassey, Business Development Manager at  Conductor Software

Performance, innovation and retention depend on the ability of leaders - at all levels - to cultivate and sustain psychological safety in the workplace. 


 

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.

 

 

 


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Jessica Jaithoo August 26, 2025
Author : Veronica Flores, CPHR, Wood Buffalo Chapter In the fast-paced world of HR, we often talk about unconscious bias, diversity, and inclusion. But one subtle form of bias that continues to shape workplace dynamics, often without us realizing it, is the halo effect . The halo effect, as outlined in Canadian Organizational Behaviour by McShane, Steen, and Tasa, is a perceptual bias where our overall impression of someone, often shaped by a single trait, influences how we judge their other qualities. I experienced the halo effect in a way that has stayed with me ever since. As someone who immigrated to Canada from a vibrant Latino community, I brought with me not only my culture and language but also a strong set of personal values: dedication to excellence, deep respect for others, and a belief in the power of organization and continuous improvement. Over the years, I've built a life in Canada and grown professionally. One thing my colleagues quickly noticed? I’m extremely organized—my files are color-coded, I like to automate tasks and improve processes, and I genuinely believe that a tidy environment leads to a clear mind. But one day, that very strength—my love for order—became the only lens through which someone saw me, and not in the way I expected. Our team was switching workstations, and I noticed a new coworker, someone from a different cultural background, standing near their new desk, not quite settling in. I casually asked if they had moved in yet, and they replied, “I’m just waiting for you to clean it first.”  At first, I laughed, thinking it was a joke. But their expression stayed serious. That’s when it hit me: they had assumed I was there to clean their desk. Why? Because I’m Latina? Because I’m tidy? Because I was organizing my own space? I simply showed them where the cleaning supplies were and walked away. But the moment stayed with me, not just because it was uncomfortable, but because it revealed something deeper about how we perceive each other at work. Later, I opened up to another coworker about what had happened. She shared a story of her own: because she is from China, a colleague once asked her to perform acupuncture or massage their neck, assuming she must know traditional Chinese medicine. She was just as stunned as I had been. These assumptions weren’t rooted in malice, but they were rooted in stereotypes. And they show how the halo effect, when combined with cultural bias, can lead to reductive and even offensive conclusions. The Hidden Cost of Snap Judgments The halo effect doesn’t always manifest in such overt ways. Sometimes, it’s as subtle as assuming a soft-spoken employee lacks leadership potential or that someone who struggles with English isn’t as intelligent. These assumptions can influence hiring decisions, performance evaluations, and even day-to-day interactions. For HR professionals, the implications are significant. When we allow the halo effect to guide our perceptions, we risk reinforcing stereotypes and limiting opportunities for others. Worse, we may unknowingly create environments where people feel unseen or misjudged. Strategies to Counter the Halo Effect Here are a few practical ways HR professionals can help reduce the impact of the halo effect in their organizations: Get to know people beyond the surface. Take time to learn about your coworkers’ skills, experiences, and goals. Be mindful of cultural assumptions. Just because someone is from a particular background doesn’t mean they fit a cultural stereotype. Create space for conversations. Sharing stories, like the ones my coworker and I exchanged, can build empathy and awareness. Focus on inclusion, not just diversity. It’s not enough to have different people in the room. We need to ensure everyone is seen and valued for who they truly are. The halo effect reminds us that perception is powerful, but not always accurate. That day in the office reminded me that even positive traits can be misinterpreted when viewed through the wrong lens. And that inclusion means more than just being present; it means being seen clearly. So, as an HR professional, ask yourself: Are you seeing your coworkers for who they really are, or just through the halo of a single trait?
By Jessica Jaithoo August 8, 2025
Author : Nicole Mahieux, Nick Canning & Kendal Tremblay Mental health is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of employee well-being, business resilience and community strength. For HR professionals, supporting mental health is no longer optional—it’s imperative. While conversations around mental health have gained traction in many industries, one critical sector still faces unique and persistent challenges: agriculture. Farmers and agricultural workers play a vital role in food production and national food security. Yet they are among the most vulnerable when it comes to mental health struggles. In fact, they experience some of the highest rates of stress, anxiety, depression—and even suicide. This is not just a personal issue. It's a workforce issue. It's a public health issue. It's a business issue. There are a range of compounding pressures makes farming one of the most mentally taxing professions.  These include: 1.Financial Stress & Unpredictability Unstable markets, weather-dependent outcomes, and shifting government policies contribute to a constant sense of economic uncertainty. 2. Isolation Many farmers work alone and live in rural areas where access to social support is limited. Social isolation increases vulnerability to mental health concerns. 3. Stigma Although mental health stigma is slowly decreasing, it remains a barrier—especially among men, who represent 74% of the agricultural workforce. Traditional gender norms often discourage open conversations or help-seeking.
By Jessica Jaithoo August 7, 2025
As a proud participant in the Glowing Hearts program , CPHR Alberta continues to champion the value that Canadian Armed Forces reservists bring to our workplaces. Since joining the program, we’ve seen firsthand how supporting reservists not only strengthens our communities but also enhances organizational resilience and leadership. The Value of Reservists in the Workplace Reservists are more than military personnel—they are strategic thinkers, adaptable leaders, and skilled collaborators. Their training equips them with discipline, problem-solving abilities, and a mission-focused mindset that translates seamlessly into civilian roles. Captain McKenzie Kibler of The Loyal Edmonton Regiment exemplifies this. In a recent deployment on Operation REASSURANCE, he developed leadership and operational skills that now enrich his civilian career. Watch his story here. Support, Recognition, and Incentives for Employers Supporting reservists doesn’t mean sacrificing business continuity—in fact, it opens the door to meaningful recognition and financial support. Through the Compensation for Employers of Reservists Program (CERP) , employers can receive grants to help offset operational costs when a reservist-employee is away for 30 days or more. At the same time, organizations that register their reservist leave policies with the Glowing Hearts program are publicly recognized on the Canadian Forces Liaison Council website and receive a certificate of support and digital badge. These benefits not only ease the logistical challenges of supporting reservists but also position your organization as a leader in community engagement and national service. Tools and Templates for HR Leaders To make it easier for organizations to support reservists, CPHR Alberta offers a Reservist Leave Policy Template. This resource outlines eligibility, leave procedures, compensation, and compliance with federal and provincial legislation—making it simple to implement a supportive policy. Access the template through the Member Portal.
MORE NEWS