A Case Study of an HRIS Implementation

09
Feb 2023
505
A paper cut out of the letter i on a yellow background

Author:  Ada Tai

Has your organization considered adopting a Human Resource Information System (HRIS)? Selecting and implementing HRIS has become a trendy topic in recent years. Employers recognize the need to enhance workplace efficiency and accuracy through integrated business applications that are reliable and user-friendly. In this blog, I will share a case study of one of our clients who is implementing an HRIS for the first time and several “aha” moments along the journey.

Background: 

Company XYZ is a value-based organization. The company experienced positive growth in the last five years: it grew its employee base from 30 to just under 100 and maintained a roster of 30 subcontractors/freelancers. Until early 2022, the accounting system was used for employee expenses and payroll. Recruitment, employee files, performance review and other employee data management functions were still done manually. Furthermore, reporting and benefits administration were handled by two other systems. Unsurprisingly, employee timesheets and time off requests were managed using Excel and email. 

The Accounting team spent endless hours every month managing multiple systems, retrieving information from one system to feed into another, and ensuring data integrity and accuracy. Managers were concerned about the inefficiency and security risk of the current method. Additionally, leaders contemplated the need for better decision-making and future scalability as the company projects a 60 - 70% headcount growth in the coming three years.

Initial Action:  

We were lucky that this was a long-term client of our company, so we were familiar with their business environment and the employee situation. Two people from our firm were assigned to this project, one being the project lead and the other person providing support. After obtaining the budget, we created a cost estimate and a project plan with major timelines, milestones, people and resources needed. Then we dived into “Needs Assessment” understanding and business requirements gathering.

Needs Assessment: 

1. We sent out a questionnaire to four types of users in the company to understand what the “must-have” functions and “nice-to-have” functions are. The users include:

  a) Frontline employees (end-users)

  b) Supervisors & managers (end-users & approvers)

  c) Accounting, IT, Administration (Functional users)

  d) Leaders (end-users, approvers & ability to oversee everything)

2. After compiling the information, we identified the top “must-have” functions as:

A table showing the hr is compatible with the current accounting system

The following were the “nice-to-have” functions:

A table showing the different departments of a company

3. We then facilitated a focus group meeting and five one-on-one meetings with leaders, functional users, and selected supervisors and staff to deep dive into their needs.

Vendor Selection:

1. With all the information collected, we quickly narrowed the selection to the top five vendors. 

2. We then sent the short-listed vendors to confirm their functionality, pricing, and customer service approach. Then our team watched their live demonstrations. Given our familiarity with the company culture and employee demographics, we knew only certain vendor systems would match the client’s needs, and the user interface must be extremely intuitive. 

3. We reported our findings and recommendations to the company. The top two vendors were brought in for live presentations and demonstrations.

  • After both demonstrations, we asked the audience to provide ratings and feedback.

4. Once the top vendor was selected, the company representative negotiated and signed the vendor agreement.

A yellow light bulb icon on a white background.When evaluating vendor pricing, a few factors should be taken into account: Company location, Cost per employee, Monthly cost, Implementation fee, Total cost of the first year, Total annual cost from the second year on.

A yellow light bulb icon on a white background.After confirming the functionalities of the selected HRIS, the company reviewed the current systems, their pricing, effectiveness, vendor relationship and contract terms, and decided as to which current systems would stay and which systems would be phased out over the coming period of time.

If someone thinks that selecting a system is the end of a complex project, it is only the beginning of it…

Implementation: 

1. The company assembled a 4-people Implementation Team, which includes a manager, an employee, an accounting person and an IT staff.

2. We then worked with the Implementation Team to decide on a department in the company that works the best as the Test Department for user/usability testing. Since HRIS systems nowadays are more intuitive, most vendors do not provide user training or training manuals. The Test Department we selected had more tech-savvy employees inclined to adapt to change.

3. The Implementation Team and our team then prepared information to transfer to the new system and converted the company’s historical data into the new system.

4. Working with the vendor, we did a “soft launch” of the new system with the Test Department for three months. The existing systems were operating at the same time. During these three months, we learned what worked well and what needed adjustment. We also gathered the Test Department staff’s feedback on a bi-weekly basis. We then worked with the vendor to ensure a smooth transition to the official launch.

5. In the fourth month, the new HRIS was officially in operation! The launch party was a lot of fun and got people’s attention. During the initial period after the launch, the Implementation Team, the Test Department and our team addressed questions from the staff. The existing systems would still be in operation for another 6 months to ensure a smooth transition and backup.

A yellow light bulb icon on a white background.Having a Test Department is a critical element to success: It ensures early adopters get a chance to use and review the new system, feed information as to what needs to be adjusted and help the company set the stage for the official launch. For large organizations with change management challenges, the Test Department also serves as the company’s influencing force for the rest of the employees/users. 

A yellow light bulb icon on a white background.Taking into account the cost of the Implementation Team and consultants’ time in the company’s HRIS budget is key.

What's now?

So far, so good! After the official launch, several training sessions were delivered to ensure a comfortable transition for employees and managers. A quarterly check-in and a formal new system evaluation were also planned to help the Implementation Team gather information and make adjustments as needed. 

Selecting and implementing HRIS system is a costly and complex project! Each organization has its unique needs, budget and challenges. Having a structured project plan and a methodical approach will help ensure businesses’ success. 

I see. I hear. I experience. is a column created by and written by Ada Tai, a chartered member of CPHR Alberta. The column is written in a blog format where Ada and invited co-authors will present their own experiences and interpretations of the world of human resources and its impact on business management. This and the subsequent posts are copyrighted materials by the author(s) and only reflect their personal views, not CPHR Alberta’s.

Author bio: With an MBA Degree, a CPHR, and an SHRM-SCP designation, Ada Tai has been working as an HR professional in a variety of industries for 15 years. Through her consulting firm, Ada and the team provide various strategic and pragmatic management consulting services.  Ada’s public speaking skills have enabled her to be regularly invited to speak about HR, people management, career search, and networking topics throughout the province. She is also a well-respected Instructor at the University of Alberta and MacEwan University.

Contact information: 

BadaB Consulting Inc. provides a wide range of human resources solutions, including Strategic HR and Succession Planning, Organizational Design & Development, Merger & Acquisition Support, Recruitment, Skills Development Training, Compensation Design, Performance Management, Workplace Investigation, Policy Development, etc. Another specialty of BadaB’s services is personal job search and career coaching. The team has effectively helped over 500 people to find work.

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta. 

 

 

 

 

The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



Leadership Risk Isn't Just a C-Suite Concern

By Marina Perkovic • July 29, 2025
Companies that invest in leadership development see real returns. According to Brandon Hall Group, organizations with strong leadership development programs are 1.5 times more likely to be financially high-performing, reinforcing the clear connection between leadership strength and business success (Brandon Hall Group, 2015). For small to mid-sized businesses, this risk can be especially high. As teams expand and complexity increases, the informal leadership structures that worked early on can start to crack. That’s where proactive leadership development and risk mitigation go hand-in-hand. The Leadership Gap Is a Hidden Business Risk According to a recent CPHR Alberta report, talent development and leadership gaps remain one of the top five organizational risks (CPHR Alberta, 2023). The consequences are rarely immediate, but they compound over time: • Missed growth opportunities • High-potential employees leaving due to lack of career clarity • Poor team morale when unprepared managers struggle to lead • Strategic drift from lack of alignment at the top A growing company without a leadership pipeline is like a car without a spare tire, it might keep rolling, but one unexpected bump can send the whole operation into a tailspin. Risk Mitigation Starts with Leadership Insight The first step in mitigating leadership risk is to move from guesswork to clarity. That means using structured tools like leadership assessments, succession planning frameworks, and targeted coaching to surface the actual capabilities of current and emerging leaders. In professional services firms, for example, it’s common to see technically strong employees promoted into management roles. While they excel in their areas of expertise, they often lack key leadership capabilities like delegation, feedback, and emotional intelligence (Gallo, 2016). Without proper development, this can lead to stalled projects, disengaged teams, and higher turnover. Leadership assessments and focused coaching are essential to identify these gaps early and build the skills needed to lead effectively. Common Leadership Risks in SMBs Every organization faces different risks, but these are some of the most common leadership vulnerabilities seen in growth-stage companies (SHRM, 2022): • Lack of succession planning: Only one person knows how to run a key function, creating bottlenecks and burnout. • Unclear decision-making authority: Teams waste time waiting for approvals or duplicating efforts due to ambiguous roles. • Promotion without preparation: High performers are promoted into leadership roles without training, leading to micromanagement or misalignment. • Poor feedback culture: A lack of honest dialogue means small issues snowball into bigger people problems. • Leadership misfit: A leader’s natural style may clash with the culture or needs of a specific team or situation. Mitigating these risks requires more than a one-time workshop. It takes intentional development, structured tools, and reinforcement over time (SHRM, 2022). What Effective Mitigation Looks Like The most successful companies don’t wait for a leadership crisis to take action. They build leadership strength proactively. Here’s what that looks like: • Leadership assessments are used during hiring and promotions to identify fit, style, and potential blind spots. • Customized coaching programs help leaders build the exact skills they need in real time, tied to their actual challenges (International Coaching Federation, 2022). • Leadership training cohorts (such as PowerUp Leadership’s “Coaching Skills for Managers” or “Authentic Leadership” programs) create a shared foundation across the organization. • Succession maps identify who is ready or could be ready for key roles in 12–24 months, creating a proactive development plan (SHRM, 2022). As companies grow, the complexity of people management increases exponentially. Systems, tools, and strategy all matter but none of them work without effective leadership behind them (McKinsey & Company, 2018). Investing in leadership development isn’t a “nice to have” for big companies, it’s a risk management strategy for every business serious about sustainable growth. 

Layoffs Are Inevitable, Abandoning People Isn’t

By Marina Perkovic • July 15, 2025
Author : Ada Tai Over the past month, I spoke with three professionals who had recently been laid off. April , a former schoolmate, has over 20 years of experience and has held management roles at several organizations. Most recently, she led a team at a large oil and gas company, where she was instrumental in building out a new service area. Despite her accomplishments, a combination of economic challenges and a lack of connection with her new boss led to her dismissal. Having been involved in layoffs before, she understood the process, but when she called me, she admitted it was much harder to be on the receiving end. She felt overwhelmed by a mix of emotions: denial, anger, betrayal, and a deep sense of failure. Carol , once a mentee of mine, built a strong foundation in the finance sector, and her persistence earned her a team lead role at a competitive mid-sized firm. Therefore, her call caught me off guard; she was trying to make sense of being included in a round of layoffs that affected 12 others. Having just been promoted, she struggled to understand why she had been chosen. She reached out for support as she navigated both the practical and emotional aftermath. Joe had been a student in one of my classes. With a master’s degree and excellent communication skills, he established a respected career in the regional non-profit sector. We maintained contact and often crossed paths through work. Joe was frequently involved in launching new initiatives and was recognized by both his boss and the board for his contributions. However, when the sector faced financial strain, he and his manager were among the 15% let go. He contacted me a month after the layoff; he had taken time to process everything and was now reflecting on what direction to take next. These stories are not uncommon. In fact, with ongoing economic uncertainty, many professionals, regardless of their experience or performance, are facing unexpected career changes. While layoffs are always challenging, the way they are handled can significantly impact both the individuals affected and the organization. This highlights a critical challenge for organizations: how can companies manage necessary workforce changes with both strategic foresight and genuine care? In addition to engaging the Human Resources department early in the planning and execution process, many businesses are increasingly recognizing the value of utilizing third-party outplacement services. Outplacement services are employer-sponsored programs designed to support both the business and departing employees during layoffs or organizational restructuring. Typically included as part of a severance package, these services offer more than just logistical support; they help individuals navigate a difficult transition with confidence. Outplacement services can be customized based on the needs and budget of the employer. Offerings often include planning for workforce reductions in collaboration with the business, delivering termination messages, and providing one-on-one career transition coaching and emotional support to affected staff. More importantly, these services help affected employees regain focus by offering practical job search guidance, resume coaching, and career direction tailored to their experience and industry. For employers, outplacement services can deliver a clear return on investment. Companies that provide structured transition support often experience fewer legal disputes and benefit from a stronger employer brand, which can positively influence talent attraction and retention. Showing care during a difficult time speaks volumes to internal teams, affected employees, clients, and the broader market. Having worked closely with businesses and professionals throughout this process, I’ve witnessed the significant difference that experienced, neutral third-party support can make. In fact, a 2023 CBIZ report, referencing Bureau of Labor Statistics data, noted that individuals who received outplacement assistance secured new roles 40% faster than those who did not receive support (CBIZ, 2023). Just imagine if April had access to a coach experienced in private sector transitions, or if Carol had received immediate help with processing her layoff and planning her next steps; the positive impact would have been immediate. In today’s environment, outplacement isn’t merely a nice option; it is a strategic necessity. How will your organization ensure a respectful and supportive transition for its workforce? When selecting an outplacement partner, consider factors such as industry experience, the ability to customize services, the quality of career coaches, and the integration of digital tools for job seekers. Not all providers offer the same level of support or results, so thorough vetting is essential.

Your Ultimate Pre-Conference Checklist for the CPHR Alberta 2025 Conference!

By Marina Perkovic • July 10, 2025
The countdown to the CPHR Alberta 2025 Conference has officially begun!
MORE NEWS