Addressing Systemic Diversity Challenges Within Your Organization: From the perspective of an I/O Psychologist

05
Apr 2022
451
Two people are shaking hands with their hands painted in different colors.

Author:  Justin M. Deonarine

In a 2020 interview, I was asked why organizations falter when trying to incorporate diversity efforts. “Diversity is not a marketing tool. You need to be ready to walk the walk. You have to acknowledge that it’s going to be a transition, not an instant return. Otherwise, the initiative will fail and diversity will be treated as a ‘fad’. And this would be a tragedy, because diversity efforts can bring so much good to both your company and the world.”

Research consistently shows that a focus on diversity provides organizations with meaningful benefits based on multiple metrics. Some of the common findings include:

  • Higher earnings.
  • Better average growth.
  • Greater innovation through diverse viewpoints.
  • Better decision-making.
  • Higher returns on equity.
  • Attracting a greater variety of talent.

Additionally, a 2020 study from Psychometrics Canada also indicates that the majority of leaders recognize these benefits and encourage diversity in their organizations 1 .

Despite their best intentions and efforts, organizations can still struggle to implement effective and meaningful diversity policies. Why? Organizations typically pursue diversity in areas such as age, gender and ethnicity. These traits are tangible, in the way that they are visible. However, do they always provide the greatest returns for a diversity program? Sometimes, the benefits are driven by intangible factors 2 , such as variety of experience and different perspectives.

This is where the “Like Me Bias” becomes a challenge. We gravitate or seek out people who are most like us. Those who think and feel the same way that they do, and share a common sense of purpose or direction. Groups with homogenous members make decisions quicker, agree more and feel more confident in their decisions. It’s easy to understand why we gravitate towards those like us: We find familiarity comforting.

However, this is also the challenge of focusing on tangible traits. The Like Me Bias isn’t limited to age, gender and ethnicity. Those with different backgrounds can share the intangibles. This bias appears the most when decisions are made based on subjective criteria, which are heavily influenced by our experience and perspectives. The key to improving diversity efforts is to harness both objective information and different perspectives when making decisions.

The Like Me Bias has many impacts during the recruitment cycle. It influences which candidates we gravitate towards and, ultimately, hire. This makes the selection process a great place to start implementing objective diversity efforts.

  • Adopting “Blind Hiring Panels”: When reviewing applications, improve objectivity by removing identifying information about a candidate that could be used in a subjective manner, even if we don’t intend to do so. This includes their name, gender, age, where their education is from, and any hobbies or interests that they may provide. Additionally, have more than one person review the applications of the top candidates, in order to bring different perspectives to the table. As an example, consider the changes that the Toronto Symphony Orchestra made in the 1980s 3 . Since that time, their team has become much more diverse than it was in the past.
  • Using psychometric assessments: Beyond the initial application, many organizations use reliable and valid psychometric assessments to gain unbiased insights into candidates. This data allows hiring teams to make more objective and informed decisions when choosing between potential candidates. Additionally, these assessments often help when constructing effective on-boarding programs for new hires.
  • Include external consultants for critical roles: Consider reaching out to consultants who are knowledgeable about finding the right candidate for the role. These individuals can help hiring teams determine or refine the qualities that they should be seeking in candidates. This outside perspective is even more valuable when the consultant is able to effectively challenge the biases that the hiring team may hold.

I am often asked if my advice above has changed due to the new structure of the working world, with remote and hybrid roles becoming more common. In short: No, it hasn’t. The benefits of harnessing diversity haven’t changed. However, more organizations are realizing the need for it, which is a change for the better.



About the Author

Justin M. Deonarine is an Industrial/Organizational Psychologist with Psychometrics Canada . He specializes in the application of data-driven decision-making to areas such as selection, leadership and corporate culture. He has worked with organizations around the world, from local non-profits to multinational corporations. Justin enjoys sharing his experience and knowledge with others, having published articles about leadership, corporate culture, diversity, innovation and entrepreneurship for a variety of business and HR resources.



References:

1. https://www.cphrab.ca/diversity-canadian-workplaces-where-we-are-and-what-we-need-do

2. https://www.inc.com/entrepreneurs-organization/the-little-known-diversity-factor-that-can-positively-impact-your-company.html

3. https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/blind-recruitment-marketplace-1.3462061

 



The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Marina Perkovic July 29, 2025
Companies that invest in leadership development see real returns. According to Brandon Hall Group, organizations with strong leadership development programs are 1.5 times more likely to be financially high-performing, reinforcing the clear connection between leadership strength and business success (Brandon Hall Group, 2015). For small to mid-sized businesses, this risk can be especially high. As teams expand and complexity increases, the informal leadership structures that worked early on can start to crack. That’s where proactive leadership development and risk mitigation go hand-in-hand. The Leadership Gap Is a Hidden Business Risk According to a recent CPHR Alberta report, talent development and leadership gaps remain one of the top five organizational risks (CPHR Alberta, 2023). The consequences are rarely immediate, but they compound over time: • Missed growth opportunities • High-potential employees leaving due to lack of career clarity • Poor team morale when unprepared managers struggle to lead • Strategic drift from lack of alignment at the top A growing company without a leadership pipeline is like a car without a spare tire, it might keep rolling, but one unexpected bump can send the whole operation into a tailspin. Risk Mitigation Starts with Leadership Insight The first step in mitigating leadership risk is to move from guesswork to clarity. That means using structured tools like leadership assessments, succession planning frameworks, and targeted coaching to surface the actual capabilities of current and emerging leaders. In professional services firms, for example, it’s common to see technically strong employees promoted into management roles. While they excel in their areas of expertise, they often lack key leadership capabilities like delegation, feedback, and emotional intelligence (Gallo, 2016). Without proper development, this can lead to stalled projects, disengaged teams, and higher turnover. Leadership assessments and focused coaching are essential to identify these gaps early and build the skills needed to lead effectively. Common Leadership Risks in SMBs Every organization faces different risks, but these are some of the most common leadership vulnerabilities seen in growth-stage companies (SHRM, 2022): • Lack of succession planning: Only one person knows how to run a key function, creating bottlenecks and burnout. • Unclear decision-making authority: Teams waste time waiting for approvals or duplicating efforts due to ambiguous roles. • Promotion without preparation: High performers are promoted into leadership roles without training, leading to micromanagement or misalignment. • Poor feedback culture: A lack of honest dialogue means small issues snowball into bigger people problems. • Leadership misfit: A leader’s natural style may clash with the culture or needs of a specific team or situation. Mitigating these risks requires more than a one-time workshop. It takes intentional development, structured tools, and reinforcement over time (SHRM, 2022). What Effective Mitigation Looks Like The most successful companies don’t wait for a leadership crisis to take action. They build leadership strength proactively. Here’s what that looks like: • Leadership assessments are used during hiring and promotions to identify fit, style, and potential blind spots. • Customized coaching programs help leaders build the exact skills they need in real time, tied to their actual challenges (International Coaching Federation, 2022). • Leadership training cohorts (such as PowerUp Leadership’s “Coaching Skills for Managers” or “Authentic Leadership” programs) create a shared foundation across the organization. • Succession maps identify who is ready or could be ready for key roles in 12–24 months, creating a proactive development plan (SHRM, 2022). As companies grow, the complexity of people management increases exponentially. Systems, tools, and strategy all matter but none of them work without effective leadership behind them (McKinsey & Company, 2018). Investing in leadership development isn’t a “nice to have” for big companies, it’s a risk management strategy for every business serious about sustainable growth. 
By Marina Perkovic July 15, 2025
Author : Ada Tai Over the past month, I spoke with three professionals who had recently been laid off. April , a former schoolmate, has over 20 years of experience and has held management roles at several organizations. Most recently, she led a team at a large oil and gas company, where she was instrumental in building out a new service area. Despite her accomplishments, a combination of economic challenges and a lack of connection with her new boss led to her dismissal. Having been involved in layoffs before, she understood the process, but when she called me, she admitted it was much harder to be on the receiving end. She felt overwhelmed by a mix of emotions: denial, anger, betrayal, and a deep sense of failure. Carol , once a mentee of mine, built a strong foundation in the finance sector, and her persistence earned her a team lead role at a competitive mid-sized firm. Therefore, her call caught me off guard; she was trying to make sense of being included in a round of layoffs that affected 12 others. Having just been promoted, she struggled to understand why she had been chosen. She reached out for support as she navigated both the practical and emotional aftermath. Joe had been a student in one of my classes. With a master’s degree and excellent communication skills, he established a respected career in the regional non-profit sector. We maintained contact and often crossed paths through work. Joe was frequently involved in launching new initiatives and was recognized by both his boss and the board for his contributions. However, when the sector faced financial strain, he and his manager were among the 15% let go. He contacted me a month after the layoff; he had taken time to process everything and was now reflecting on what direction to take next. These stories are not uncommon. In fact, with ongoing economic uncertainty, many professionals, regardless of their experience or performance, are facing unexpected career changes. While layoffs are always challenging, the way they are handled can significantly impact both the individuals affected and the organization. This highlights a critical challenge for organizations: how can companies manage necessary workforce changes with both strategic foresight and genuine care? In addition to engaging the Human Resources department early in the planning and execution process, many businesses are increasingly recognizing the value of utilizing third-party outplacement services. Outplacement services are employer-sponsored programs designed to support both the business and departing employees during layoffs or organizational restructuring. Typically included as part of a severance package, these services offer more than just logistical support; they help individuals navigate a difficult transition with confidence. Outplacement services can be customized based on the needs and budget of the employer. Offerings often include planning for workforce reductions in collaboration with the business, delivering termination messages, and providing one-on-one career transition coaching and emotional support to affected staff. More importantly, these services help affected employees regain focus by offering practical job search guidance, resume coaching, and career direction tailored to their experience and industry. For employers, outplacement services can deliver a clear return on investment. Companies that provide structured transition support often experience fewer legal disputes and benefit from a stronger employer brand, which can positively influence talent attraction and retention. Showing care during a difficult time speaks volumes to internal teams, affected employees, clients, and the broader market. Having worked closely with businesses and professionals throughout this process, I’ve witnessed the significant difference that experienced, neutral third-party support can make. In fact, a 2023 CBIZ report, referencing Bureau of Labor Statistics data, noted that individuals who received outplacement assistance secured new roles 40% faster than those who did not receive support (CBIZ, 2023). Just imagine if April had access to a coach experienced in private sector transitions, or if Carol had received immediate help with processing her layoff and planning her next steps; the positive impact would have been immediate. In today’s environment, outplacement isn’t merely a nice option; it is a strategic necessity. How will your organization ensure a respectful and supportive transition for its workforce? When selecting an outplacement partner, consider factors such as industry experience, the ability to customize services, the quality of career coaches, and the integration of digital tools for job seekers. Not all providers offer the same level of support or results, so thorough vetting is essential.
By Marina Perkovic July 10, 2025
The countdown to the CPHR Alberta 2025 Conference has officially begun!
MORE NEWS