Understanding the Code of Ethics: What You Need to Know (Competence)

07
Sep 2023
91
A man in a suit is typing on a computer keyboard.

Author:  Dr. Christian Cook, CPHR, SHRM-SCP, ICD.D

All CPHR members must comply with our Code of Ethics. Your reputation, our collective reputation and our profession, depends upon it. 

As human resources professionals, we are likely familiar with codes in our workplace; some of us may have even had a hand in crafting those. In addition to committing to codes of ethics or conduct in our workplaces, it is also valuable to revisit the CPHR Code of Ethics for our profession occasionally to ensure we hold ourselves and others accountable. Each week this fall, members of the Discipline Committee will pose short scenarios to support the application of particular areas of the Code of Ethics to “make it stick.” 

This week, let’s discuss the requirement for Competence. Competence is a requirement in most professional codes (law, accounting, health care professionals, and yes, HR professionals, too!). 

In addition to carrying out professional duties competently, HR practitioners must do so with honesty and diligence. They must only work within their skillset’s parameters when assuming new tasks.  That said, we appreciate that HR is a learning profession and that mentoring new professionals is critical for the profession and perhaps even society! So, one can take on stretch assignments , be sure. However, support must be sought to ensure no harm is done and the HR professional in the learning stage doesn’t compromise our HR standards of competence or professional responsibilities.* 

Like many cases of learning, applying this knowledge to a real (or hypothetical) scenario is helpful. Let’s use the example of Jerrod, an HR business partner. He is a newly designated CPHR professional and has graduated from an accredited post-secondary institution in Alberta. He has worked in HR for over five years and passed the Experience Validation Assessment in 2022. He is grateful to his mentor at his previous employer (a large, non-unionized, provincially regulated credit union in Alberta) who supported his accreditation. Much that he enjoyed his time at the credit union, he was attracted to a smaller school district in Alberta for a junior role in labour relations, a field he had long been interested in and likely would not get engaged in at his old employer. 

Jerrod joined the school district and started working quickly at learning the collective bargaining agreement, past and current grievances, and longstanding bargaining issues for the employer. He was the junior of four labour relations professionals on the team. He felt like he was thriving and also acting like a sponge, soaking up so much of the knowledge and experience around him. About six months in, though, as can happen in our sector, there was a lot of turnover at the school district. Just after his probationary period ended, his mentor resigned, and the buddy he had been paired with for onboarding also left the organization. His remaining colleague was also relatively new to the team and was trying to find her way to a business partner role as she had decided LR was not for her. 

Though new, Jerrod had made a very positive impression on his leaders. He was quick to pick up on new tasks, comfortable with assuming responsibility, and had a lot of curiosity, which is typical for high-potential employees. Due to these attributes and the line manager’s interest in retaining Jerrod, they suggested he take the lead role at the bargaining table scheduled for January 2024. After all, the relations between the teachers and administration were excellent; they knew there was funding for increases, and many of the line managers had long tenure with the organization for backup (though none had participated in collective bargaining). 

From what we know so far, what should Jerrod do? This feels like a fantastic career opportunity that could be his big break and catapult his career. 

When considering the issue of competence, Jerrod’s course of action should be not to accept the role of Chief Negotiator for the school district. He would be entering a precarious situation and putting his organization at risk. The threshold of competence (again, from what we know in the scenario) cannot be met, and the gap is just too large between what Jerrod has learned and what Jerrod is being asked to do. There are other options to meet the business needs, including the provision of an external or seconded bargaining agent. There are mentoring opportunities here for Jerrod to grow into this position in the future, though to stay compliant with the Code, the right move right now would be to decline the opportunity. 

As noted in the Code, HR practitioners must maintain competence in carrying out their responsibilities. They must ensure that activities engaged in are within the limits of their knowledge, experience, and skill. When providing services outside one’s level of competence or the profession, the necessary assistance must be sought to not compromise professional responsibility.


*This paragraph excerpted/adapted from /understanding-code-ethics-what-you-need-know



The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong soley to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Marina Perkovic July 29, 2025
Companies that invest in leadership development see real returns. According to Brandon Hall Group, organizations with strong leadership development programs are 1.5 times more likely to be financially high-performing, reinforcing the clear connection between leadership strength and business success (Brandon Hall Group, 2015). For small to mid-sized businesses, this risk can be especially high. As teams expand and complexity increases, the informal leadership structures that worked early on can start to crack. That’s where proactive leadership development and risk mitigation go hand-in-hand. The Leadership Gap Is a Hidden Business Risk According to a recent CPHR Alberta report, talent development and leadership gaps remain one of the top five organizational risks (CPHR Alberta, 2023). The consequences are rarely immediate, but they compound over time: • Missed growth opportunities • High-potential employees leaving due to lack of career clarity • Poor team morale when unprepared managers struggle to lead • Strategic drift from lack of alignment at the top A growing company without a leadership pipeline is like a car without a spare tire, it might keep rolling, but one unexpected bump can send the whole operation into a tailspin. Risk Mitigation Starts with Leadership Insight The first step in mitigating leadership risk is to move from guesswork to clarity. That means using structured tools like leadership assessments, succession planning frameworks, and targeted coaching to surface the actual capabilities of current and emerging leaders. In professional services firms, for example, it’s common to see technically strong employees promoted into management roles. While they excel in their areas of expertise, they often lack key leadership capabilities like delegation, feedback, and emotional intelligence (Gallo, 2016). Without proper development, this can lead to stalled projects, disengaged teams, and higher turnover. Leadership assessments and focused coaching are essential to identify these gaps early and build the skills needed to lead effectively. Common Leadership Risks in SMBs Every organization faces different risks, but these are some of the most common leadership vulnerabilities seen in growth-stage companies (SHRM, 2022): • Lack of succession planning: Only one person knows how to run a key function, creating bottlenecks and burnout. • Unclear decision-making authority: Teams waste time waiting for approvals or duplicating efforts due to ambiguous roles. • Promotion without preparation: High performers are promoted into leadership roles without training, leading to micromanagement or misalignment. • Poor feedback culture: A lack of honest dialogue means small issues snowball into bigger people problems. • Leadership misfit: A leader’s natural style may clash with the culture or needs of a specific team or situation. Mitigating these risks requires more than a one-time workshop. It takes intentional development, structured tools, and reinforcement over time (SHRM, 2022). What Effective Mitigation Looks Like The most successful companies don’t wait for a leadership crisis to take action. They build leadership strength proactively. Here’s what that looks like: • Leadership assessments are used during hiring and promotions to identify fit, style, and potential blind spots. • Customized coaching programs help leaders build the exact skills they need in real time, tied to their actual challenges (International Coaching Federation, 2022). • Leadership training cohorts (such as PowerUp Leadership’s “Coaching Skills for Managers” or “Authentic Leadership” programs) create a shared foundation across the organization. • Succession maps identify who is ready or could be ready for key roles in 12–24 months, creating a proactive development plan (SHRM, 2022). As companies grow, the complexity of people management increases exponentially. Systems, tools, and strategy all matter but none of them work without effective leadership behind them (McKinsey & Company, 2018). Investing in leadership development isn’t a “nice to have” for big companies, it’s a risk management strategy for every business serious about sustainable growth. 
By Marina Perkovic July 15, 2025
Author : Ada Tai Over the past month, I spoke with three professionals who had recently been laid off. April , a former schoolmate, has over 20 years of experience and has held management roles at several organizations. Most recently, she led a team at a large oil and gas company, where she was instrumental in building out a new service area. Despite her accomplishments, a combination of economic challenges and a lack of connection with her new boss led to her dismissal. Having been involved in layoffs before, she understood the process, but when she called me, she admitted it was much harder to be on the receiving end. She felt overwhelmed by a mix of emotions: denial, anger, betrayal, and a deep sense of failure. Carol , once a mentee of mine, built a strong foundation in the finance sector, and her persistence earned her a team lead role at a competitive mid-sized firm. Therefore, her call caught me off guard; she was trying to make sense of being included in a round of layoffs that affected 12 others. Having just been promoted, she struggled to understand why she had been chosen. She reached out for support as she navigated both the practical and emotional aftermath. Joe had been a student in one of my classes. With a master’s degree and excellent communication skills, he established a respected career in the regional non-profit sector. We maintained contact and often crossed paths through work. Joe was frequently involved in launching new initiatives and was recognized by both his boss and the board for his contributions. However, when the sector faced financial strain, he and his manager were among the 15% let go. He contacted me a month after the layoff; he had taken time to process everything and was now reflecting on what direction to take next. These stories are not uncommon. In fact, with ongoing economic uncertainty, many professionals, regardless of their experience or performance, are facing unexpected career changes. While layoffs are always challenging, the way they are handled can significantly impact both the individuals affected and the organization. This highlights a critical challenge for organizations: how can companies manage necessary workforce changes with both strategic foresight and genuine care? In addition to engaging the Human Resources department early in the planning and execution process, many businesses are increasingly recognizing the value of utilizing third-party outplacement services. Outplacement services are employer-sponsored programs designed to support both the business and departing employees during layoffs or organizational restructuring. Typically included as part of a severance package, these services offer more than just logistical support; they help individuals navigate a difficult transition with confidence. Outplacement services can be customized based on the needs and budget of the employer. Offerings often include planning for workforce reductions in collaboration with the business, delivering termination messages, and providing one-on-one career transition coaching and emotional support to affected staff. More importantly, these services help affected employees regain focus by offering practical job search guidance, resume coaching, and career direction tailored to their experience and industry. For employers, outplacement services can deliver a clear return on investment. Companies that provide structured transition support often experience fewer legal disputes and benefit from a stronger employer brand, which can positively influence talent attraction and retention. Showing care during a difficult time speaks volumes to internal teams, affected employees, clients, and the broader market. Having worked closely with businesses and professionals throughout this process, I’ve witnessed the significant difference that experienced, neutral third-party support can make. In fact, a 2023 CBIZ report, referencing Bureau of Labor Statistics data, noted that individuals who received outplacement assistance secured new roles 40% faster than those who did not receive support (CBIZ, 2023). Just imagine if April had access to a coach experienced in private sector transitions, or if Carol had received immediate help with processing her layoff and planning her next steps; the positive impact would have been immediate. In today’s environment, outplacement isn’t merely a nice option; it is a strategic necessity. How will your organization ensure a respectful and supportive transition for its workforce? When selecting an outplacement partner, consider factors such as industry experience, the ability to customize services, the quality of career coaches, and the integration of digital tools for job seekers. Not all providers offer the same level of support or results, so thorough vetting is essential.
By Marina Perkovic July 10, 2025
The countdown to the CPHR Alberta 2025 Conference has officially begun!
MORE NEWS