Older Adults Buffer Against Exploitation - An Ageist Series (2 of 3)

08
Aug 2024
CPHR Alberta
153
A group of people are connected to each other in a network.

Author : Manley Osbak 

Excluding older adults from the workforce encourages the development of exploitative environments. Organizations thrive on instrumental transactions in which something is traded for something. Young adults, aged 25 to 45, are often eager to engage in transactional relationships if the rewards are compelling. The resulting demand – supply co-dependence can produce a workplace culture that reduces people to mere instrumentality. Older adults can buffer young people from the emergence of such exploitative cultures, however, by balancing instrumental and competitive values with constitutive and cooperative values.

People make choices about which goals to pursue, attempting to maximize the benefits while minimizing the costs. This process is known as selection, optimization, and compensation. As our available resources change throughout life, so too do our goals. Young adults often prioritize individual distinction and the acquisition of material and social resources. Driven to achieve personal goals, they leverage social interactions strategically and prioritize competitive interests. In optimizing the benefits of their selected goals, young adults may exclude those who don’t directly contribute to their competitive interests, and thereby fail to foresee, minimize, and compensate for unintended consequences.

The early 20th century saw the emergence of Classical Management, shaped by Frederick Taylor’s Scientific Management, Henri Fayol’s Principles of Management, and Max Weber’s development of bureaucratic organizations. This management philosophy emphasized rationality, predictability, impersonality, technical competence, and authoritarianism. Although not inherently limited to instrumentalism, Classical Management has increasingly focused on the instrumental value of resources—assessing the worth of ideas, actions, or objects solely on their utility in achieving desired outcomes. While this approach may be practical for managing objects, it becomes unethical when applied to people.

Instrumental pursuits involve actions that are not inherently rewarding but are pursued because they lead to a reward. Constitutive pursuits are actions that are rewarding in and of themselves, valued for the inherent satisfaction that they provide. Instrumental pursuits, being extrinsically motivated, place the locus of control externally—dependent on others and specific outcomes. Conversely, constitutive pursuits, driven by intrinsic motivation, keep the locus of control internal, anchored within oneself. 

The Classical Management approach can easily over-emphasize instrumentalism: people become objects and the relationship between the business and it’s employees becomes purely transactional. Reduced to mere instrumentality, people’s feelings, intentions, thoughts, and experiences become largely irrelevant. When young adults select instrumental pursuits, they choose work environments that support and reward instrumentalism. The reciprocal demand – supply relationship creates a reinforcing loop that can lead to exploitive work cultures.

The inclusion of older adults can buffer young adults from the development of overly instrumental work cultures by balancing instrumental and competitive values with constitutive and cooperative values. As people transition into middle-adulthood, their focus often shifts from pursuing actions with instrumental value to those with inherent meaning. Older adults tend to prioritize constitutive actions, that lead to positive affect (stable emotional disposition) and social embeddedness and functional community. They are, therefore, uniquely positioned to infuse the workplace with constitutive and cooperative values.

Recent research demonstrates that values change when the perception of time change. When time is seen as expansive, as it may in young adulthood, people are more willing to delay personal authenticity to acquire resources and establish their positions within the competitive hierarchy. As people age, however, they begin to see time as limited, personal authenticity becomes less negotiable, and people are drawn to activities that hold emotional salience or personal significance. Consequently, while young adults may engage in instrumental actions that yield future benefits, older adults tend to prefer constitutive actions that are meaningful in the present.

While middle-aged and older adults may show less interest in opportunities for professional growth and status compared to their younger counterparts, they often demonstrate a greater inclination towards helping others, investing in relationships, and engaging in organizational citizenship behavior. This shift is crucial as it fosters the development of a more balanced workplace culture that can protect young adults from the toxicity of overly instrumental work environments. 

The exclusion of older adults from the workforce not only deprives organizations of valuable experience and wisdom but may foster exploitative environments that over-emphasize instrumental transactions. Young adults, being particularly susceptible to this situation, may find themselves in roles where their worth is measured solely by their output. In contrast, the inclusion of older adults may introduce a more balanced perspective, emphasizing relational and intrinsic values over purely instrumental ones. This intergenerational approach not only enriches the workplace culture but also acts as a protective buffer for younger employees, shielding them from exploitative practices and contributing to a healthier, more supportive work environment. Recognizing and harnessing the diverse strengths of all age groups is essential for creating a more sustainable, productive, and generative workplace.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.


Manley Osbak is a Workforce Development Specialist with Work Locomotion where he leads the development and delivery of supervisor training. As a Certified Training and Development Professional with over 25 years of experience in the energy, construction, and manufacturing sectors, Manley focuses on helping supervisors master their roles in an increasingly complex operating environment. Having authored and coauthored numerous journal papers and trade magazine articles, Manley is well known for his investigative approach and crisp delivery. Connect with him on LinkedIn and access his current work on worklocomotion.Substack.com.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Jessica Jaithoo August 26, 2025
Author : Veronica Flores, CPHR, Wood Buffalo Chapter In the fast-paced world of HR, we often talk about unconscious bias, diversity, and inclusion. But one subtle form of bias that continues to shape workplace dynamics, often without us realizing it, is the halo effect . The halo effect, as outlined in Canadian Organizational Behaviour by McShane, Steen, and Tasa, is a perceptual bias where our overall impression of someone, often shaped by a single trait, influences how we judge their other qualities. I experienced the halo effect in a way that has stayed with me ever since. As someone who immigrated to Canada from a vibrant Latino community, I brought with me not only my culture and language but also a strong set of personal values: dedication to excellence, deep respect for others, and a belief in the power of organization and continuous improvement. Over the years, I've built a life in Canada and grown professionally. One thing my colleagues quickly noticed? I’m extremely organized—my files are color-coded, I like to automate tasks and improve processes, and I genuinely believe that a tidy environment leads to a clear mind. But one day, that very strength—my love for order—became the only lens through which someone saw me, and not in the way I expected. Our team was switching workstations, and I noticed a new coworker, someone from a different cultural background, standing near their new desk, not quite settling in. I casually asked if they had moved in yet, and they replied, “I’m just waiting for you to clean it first.”  At first, I laughed, thinking it was a joke. But their expression stayed serious. That’s when it hit me: they had assumed I was there to clean their desk. Why? Because I’m Latina? Because I’m tidy? Because I was organizing my own space? I simply showed them where the cleaning supplies were and walked away. But the moment stayed with me, not just because it was uncomfortable, but because it revealed something deeper about how we perceive each other at work. Later, I opened up to another coworker about what had happened. She shared a story of her own: because she is from China, a colleague once asked her to perform acupuncture or massage their neck, assuming she must know traditional Chinese medicine. She was just as stunned as I had been. These assumptions weren’t rooted in malice, but they were rooted in stereotypes. And they show how the halo effect, when combined with cultural bias, can lead to reductive and even offensive conclusions. The Hidden Cost of Snap Judgments The halo effect doesn’t always manifest in such overt ways. Sometimes, it’s as subtle as assuming a soft-spoken employee lacks leadership potential or that someone who struggles with English isn’t as intelligent. These assumptions can influence hiring decisions, performance evaluations, and even day-to-day interactions. For HR professionals, the implications are significant. When we allow the halo effect to guide our perceptions, we risk reinforcing stereotypes and limiting opportunities for others. Worse, we may unknowingly create environments where people feel unseen or misjudged. Strategies to Counter the Halo Effect Here are a few practical ways HR professionals can help reduce the impact of the halo effect in their organizations: Get to know people beyond the surface. Take time to learn about your coworkers’ skills, experiences, and goals. Be mindful of cultural assumptions. Just because someone is from a particular background doesn’t mean they fit a cultural stereotype. Create space for conversations. Sharing stories, like the ones my coworker and I exchanged, can build empathy and awareness. Focus on inclusion, not just diversity. It’s not enough to have different people in the room. We need to ensure everyone is seen and valued for who they truly are. The halo effect reminds us that perception is powerful, but not always accurate. That day in the office reminded me that even positive traits can be misinterpreted when viewed through the wrong lens. And that inclusion means more than just being present; it means being seen clearly. So, as an HR professional, ask yourself: Are you seeing your coworkers for who they really are, or just through the halo of a single trait?
By Jessica Jaithoo August 8, 2025
Author : Nicole Mahieux, Nick Canning & Kendal Tremblay Mental health is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of employee well-being, business resilience and community strength. For HR professionals, supporting mental health is no longer optional—it’s imperative. While conversations around mental health have gained traction in many industries, one critical sector still faces unique and persistent challenges: agriculture. Farmers and agricultural workers play a vital role in food production and national food security. Yet they are among the most vulnerable when it comes to mental health struggles. In fact, they experience some of the highest rates of stress, anxiety, depression—and even suicide. This is not just a personal issue. It's a workforce issue. It's a public health issue. It's a business issue. There are a range of compounding pressures makes farming one of the most mentally taxing professions.  These include: 1.Financial Stress & Unpredictability Unstable markets, weather-dependent outcomes, and shifting government policies contribute to a constant sense of economic uncertainty. 2. Isolation Many farmers work alone and live in rural areas where access to social support is limited. Social isolation increases vulnerability to mental health concerns. 3. Stigma Although mental health stigma is slowly decreasing, it remains a barrier—especially among men, who represent 74% of the agricultural workforce. Traditional gender norms often discourage open conversations or help-seeking.
By Jessica Jaithoo August 7, 2025
As a proud participant in the Glowing Hearts program , CPHR Alberta continues to champion the value that Canadian Armed Forces reservists bring to our workplaces. Since joining the program, we’ve seen firsthand how supporting reservists not only strengthens our communities but also enhances organizational resilience and leadership. The Value of Reservists in the Workplace Reservists are more than military personnel—they are strategic thinkers, adaptable leaders, and skilled collaborators. Their training equips them with discipline, problem-solving abilities, and a mission-focused mindset that translates seamlessly into civilian roles. Captain McKenzie Kibler of The Loyal Edmonton Regiment exemplifies this. In a recent deployment on Operation REASSURANCE, he developed leadership and operational skills that now enrich his civilian career. Watch his story here. Support, Recognition, and Incentives for Employers Supporting reservists doesn’t mean sacrificing business continuity—in fact, it opens the door to meaningful recognition and financial support. Through the Compensation for Employers of Reservists Program (CERP) , employers can receive grants to help offset operational costs when a reservist-employee is away for 30 days or more. At the same time, organizations that register their reservist leave policies with the Glowing Hearts program are publicly recognized on the Canadian Forces Liaison Council website and receive a certificate of support and digital badge. These benefits not only ease the logistical challenges of supporting reservists but also position your organization as a leader in community engagement and national service. Tools and Templates for HR Leaders To make it easier for organizations to support reservists, CPHR Alberta offers a Reservist Leave Policy Template. This resource outlines eligibility, leave procedures, compensation, and compliance with federal and provincial legislation—making it simple to implement a supportive policy. Access the template through the Member Portal.
MORE NEWS