Older Adults Buffer Against Exploitation - An Ageist Series (2 of 3)

08
Aug 2024
CPHR Alberta
153
A group of people are connected to each other in a network.

Author : Manley Osbak 

Excluding older adults from the workforce encourages the development of exploitative environments. Organizations thrive on instrumental transactions in which something is traded for something. Young adults, aged 25 to 45, are often eager to engage in transactional relationships if the rewards are compelling. The resulting demand – supply co-dependence can produce a workplace culture that reduces people to mere instrumentality. Older adults can buffer young people from the emergence of such exploitative cultures, however, by balancing instrumental and competitive values with constitutive and cooperative values.

People make choices about which goals to pursue, attempting to maximize the benefits while minimizing the costs. This process is known as selection, optimization, and compensation. As our available resources change throughout life, so too do our goals. Young adults often prioritize individual distinction and the acquisition of material and social resources. Driven to achieve personal goals, they leverage social interactions strategically and prioritize competitive interests. In optimizing the benefits of their selected goals, young adults may exclude those who don’t directly contribute to their competitive interests, and thereby fail to foresee, minimize, and compensate for unintended consequences.

The early 20th century saw the emergence of Classical Management, shaped by Frederick Taylor’s Scientific Management, Henri Fayol’s Principles of Management, and Max Weber’s development of bureaucratic organizations. This management philosophy emphasized rationality, predictability, impersonality, technical competence, and authoritarianism. Although not inherently limited to instrumentalism, Classical Management has increasingly focused on the instrumental value of resources—assessing the worth of ideas, actions, or objects solely on their utility in achieving desired outcomes. While this approach may be practical for managing objects, it becomes unethical when applied to people.

Instrumental pursuits involve actions that are not inherently rewarding but are pursued because they lead to a reward. Constitutive pursuits are actions that are rewarding in and of themselves, valued for the inherent satisfaction that they provide. Instrumental pursuits, being extrinsically motivated, place the locus of control externally—dependent on others and specific outcomes. Conversely, constitutive pursuits, driven by intrinsic motivation, keep the locus of control internal, anchored within oneself. 

The Classical Management approach can easily over-emphasize instrumentalism: people become objects and the relationship between the business and it’s employees becomes purely transactional. Reduced to mere instrumentality, people’s feelings, intentions, thoughts, and experiences become largely irrelevant. When young adults select instrumental pursuits, they choose work environments that support and reward instrumentalism. The reciprocal demand – supply relationship creates a reinforcing loop that can lead to exploitive work cultures.

The inclusion of older adults can buffer young adults from the development of overly instrumental work cultures by balancing instrumental and competitive values with constitutive and cooperative values. As people transition into middle-adulthood, their focus often shifts from pursuing actions with instrumental value to those with inherent meaning. Older adults tend to prioritize constitutive actions, that lead to positive affect (stable emotional disposition) and social embeddedness and functional community. They are, therefore, uniquely positioned to infuse the workplace with constitutive and cooperative values.

Recent research demonstrates that values change when the perception of time change. When time is seen as expansive, as it may in young adulthood, people are more willing to delay personal authenticity to acquire resources and establish their positions within the competitive hierarchy. As people age, however, they begin to see time as limited, personal authenticity becomes less negotiable, and people are drawn to activities that hold emotional salience or personal significance. Consequently, while young adults may engage in instrumental actions that yield future benefits, older adults tend to prefer constitutive actions that are meaningful in the present.

While middle-aged and older adults may show less interest in opportunities for professional growth and status compared to their younger counterparts, they often demonstrate a greater inclination towards helping others, investing in relationships, and engaging in organizational citizenship behavior. This shift is crucial as it fosters the development of a more balanced workplace culture that can protect young adults from the toxicity of overly instrumental work environments. 

The exclusion of older adults from the workforce not only deprives organizations of valuable experience and wisdom but may foster exploitative environments that over-emphasize instrumental transactions. Young adults, being particularly susceptible to this situation, may find themselves in roles where their worth is measured solely by their output. In contrast, the inclusion of older adults may introduce a more balanced perspective, emphasizing relational and intrinsic values over purely instrumental ones. This intergenerational approach not only enriches the workplace culture but also acts as a protective buffer for younger employees, shielding them from exploitative practices and contributing to a healthier, more supportive work environment. Recognizing and harnessing the diverse strengths of all age groups is essential for creating a more sustainable, productive, and generative workplace.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.


Manley Osbak is a Workforce Development Specialist with Work Locomotion where he leads the development and delivery of supervisor training. As a Certified Training and Development Professional with over 25 years of experience in the energy, construction, and manufacturing sectors, Manley focuses on helping supervisors master their roles in an increasingly complex operating environment. Having authored and coauthored numerous journal papers and trade magazine articles, Manley is well known for his investigative approach and crisp delivery. Connect with him on LinkedIn and access his current work on worklocomotion.Substack.com.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Jessica Jaithoo November 19, 2025
Author: Ada Tai, MBA, CPHR, SHRM-SCP After publishing “ A Strategic Guide to Organization Restructuring, Part 1 ,” I heard a consistent follow-up question from leaders: “How do you actually re-design an organizational structure so it aligns with strategy, future needs, and the realities of the day-to-day operations?” In this post, I will take you behind the scenes of a recent restructuring project our firm completed and walk you through the steps for designing a structure that works not just today, but also for the next 3 - 5 years. Step One: Understand the Organization Restructuring is not a mechanical exercise. Before anyone touches boxes on an org. chart, leaders must understand the full context of the organization: its challenges, aspirations, constraints, and people. Recently, our team worked with a large public-sector entity that hadn’t reviewed its structure in more than a decade. Over time, several issues had emerged: Long-standing role ambiguity and workflow friction Significant retention and succession challenges A rapidly growing industry and expanding service demands A CEO overwhelmed with too many direct reports Insufficient leadership depth in the layer immediately below the CEO The mandate was clear: Design a structure that could carry the organization for the next 3–5 years. Before jumping in, we partnered with the executive team to answer a set of foundational questions: Why is a new structure needed now? What pressures, risks, or opportunities are driving the change? What is the organization trying to achieve long-term? We reviewed vision, mission, values, strategic priorities, and expected growth. How is the organization currently designed? We examined complexity, formality, decision flows, span of control, talent mix, communication channels, policies, and people challenges. What work must happen to deliver services successfully? We mapped critical processes and clarified who is responsible for what work today and tomorrow. What resources and budget constraints shape the options? We did a reality check. Answering these questions transforms guesswork into a strategic foundation. Step Two: Plan for the Structure Review Once aligned on objectives and constraints, we co-created a plan for the whole structure review. 1. A small project team was assembled within the organization. This was a group of leaders/champions who would serve as our partners, sounding board, and communication anchors throughout the process. 2. To design a structure that reflects reality rather than assumptions, we needed both qualitative and quantitative insights. Together with the project team, we developed a data-collection plan that included: On-site tours to understand operations and workflow in context In-person interviews with employees across departments, tenure levels, roles, and demographic groups Review of organizational documents , including strategy, service data, operational metrics, etc. 3. We also conducted external research to understand the demand for the organization’s services, the competitive landscape, and industry benchmarks. The goal was to build a complete, nuanced picture of how work actually gets done. Step Three: Design the Structure Over the next several weeks, we conducted interviews with 80% of the head office staff and 60% of the frontline workforce. One important message we emphasized to every group is: “This review is not a performance assessment, nor an attempt to eliminate jobs. It is about building a structure that sets everyone up for success.” Gradually, as we gained insights, a clear picture emerged of what the future structure could and should be. We facilitated a series of structural design sessions with the project team. These sessions were collaborative, candid, and grounded in both data and lived experience. Together, we co-created: A transition structure for the upcoming year — providing stability while preparing for change. A future-state, growth-oriented structure designed for the next 3 – 5 years — with more substantial leadership depth, transparent accountability, and defined pathways for talent development and succession. The result was not just an org. chart. It was a blueprint for how the organization would operate, make decisions, support employees, and deliver services at a higher level. Step Four: Support the People Side of Change Even the best-designed structure can fall apart without thoughtful implementation. Once the project team felt confident in the proposed structures, the next steps were: Securing Board approval Preparing a comprehensive communication plan Engaging employees with clarity, empathy, and transparency We had the privilege of presenting the new design and its rationale to the Board. After approval, we supported the organization as it rolled out the change to staff, ensuring leaders were prepared to answer questions, set expectations, and guide their teams through the transition. Structure isn’t just architecture; it impacts morale, trust, and people’s sense of security. The human side must be handled with the same care as the technical side. Final Thoughts Restructuring is a strategic redesign of how an organization works, leads, and delivers value. A thoughtful structure review requires three things: Deep understanding of the organization’s reality Collaborative design grounded in data Careful implementation that supports people When these pieces come together, restructuring becomes more than a response to pressure. It is an opportunity to strengthen leadership capacity, improve clarity and accountability, and position the organization for sustainable growth. Check out my previous blog: “ A Strategic Guide to Organization Restructuring, Part 1 ” 
By Jessica Jaithoo November 19, 2025
Alberta’s labour market is dynamic, and HR professionals need timely insights and practical tools to make informed decisions. To help you navigate hiring trends, funding opportunities, and compliance requirements, here are three key resources you should know about: 1. Labour Market Information Bulletin The Regional Employer Supports Bulletin provides a snapshot of Alberta’s labour market, including: Employment Trends: September saw a 1.7% increase in employment , reversing previous declines. Unemployment Rate: Currently at 7.8% , slightly above the national average. Wage Updates: Average weekly wages rose to $1,433.62 . Upcoming Webinars: Topics include hiring foreign workers, employment standards, and psychological health and safety. Explore Labour Market Notes 2. Hiring Demand Bulletin The September Hiring Demand Bulletin offers detailed insights into job postings and hiring patterns: Job Postings: Over 30,500 new openings in September, with Calgary and Edmonton leading the way. Top Occupations: Retail salespersons, cooks, registered nurses, and material handlers. Sector Trends: Sales and service roles dominate (31%), followed by trades and transport. Regional Highlights: Calgary posted 11,004 openings , Edmonton 10,032 . View full hiring demand details 3. Employer Resources Guide Looking for ways to attract, train, and retain talent ? The Employer Resources Guide is packed with programs and funding opportunities: Grants & Funding: Canada-Alberta Productivity Grant – supports training to boost productivity. Workforce Strategies Grant – funds innovative workforce development solutions. Industry-Specific Programs: Food Futures Program – wage subsidies for food industry placements. ECO Canada – training and wage subsidies for environmental jobs. Youth & Apprenticeship Incentives: CAREERS Internship Programs – up to $7,500 for hiring youth. Student Work Placement Program – funding for co-op and internship positions. Recruitment Tools: Job Bank – free job posting platform. Agriculture Job Connector – match workers with agri-food employers. Access the full Employer Resources Guide Why These Resources Matter Together, these tools help HR professionals: Plan strategically with accurate labour market data. Fill critical roles by understanding hiring trends. Leverage funding to reduce recruitment and training costs. Stay compliant with employment standards and best practices. Take Action Today: Register for upcoming webinars on employment standards and workforce programs. Connect with a Workforce Consultant for tailored advice. Bookmark these resources to keep your HR strategies future-ready.
By Jessica Jaithoo November 10, 2025
Author: Jennifer Muellers, Katy O’Brien-Watson, and Mandy Ingraham (Grande Prairie Chapter Committee) Every October, Alberta celebrates Disability Employment Awareness Month (DEAM) which promotes employment inclusion and increased participation of workers with disabilities in Alberta’s economy. DEAM celebrates the contributions of workers with disabilities and supports employers in practicing inclusive hiring (Government of Alberta, 2025). The Grande Prairie Chapter chose a local story of a girl named Kiesha, who was told after her car accident she would likely never walk again. Kiesha uses her story to inspire and uplift others through her journey of perseverance through public speaking engagements. Kiesha frames her journey not just as healing for herself, but as something that can help and inspire others in similar situations. Her film touches on living and working with disability in a rural setting like Grande Prairie and how accessibility, advocacy, community support and awareness are so important to her success. It shows through her positive outlook she empowers those around her even through her job at Costco. A local business owner speaks on his experience of having Kiesha as a client at his business and how this made him think differently about his business environment to be welcoming and accessible for all within the community. The film Able is a production supported by STORYHIVE and is made available (free on-demand) via TELUS Optik. The Changing World of Work The world of work is always evolving, and it is more accepting of individuals and their unique abilities than ever before, however, each instance of disability and accommodation cannot be given a ‘one size fits all’ mentality. There are many different types of disabilities and health factors that organizations need to be mindful of and accommodate. For example: cognitive and mental health disabilities (learning disabilities, autism spectrum, ADHD, etc.), physical disabilities (colour blindness), and chronic health issues (addiction, diabetes, epilepsy, Ehler Danlos syndrome, lupus). Even temporary conditions, such as pregnancy and menopause need to be accommodated in the workplace. The partnership between Human Resources and Management along with employees and other stakeholders can lead to deeper understanding and appreciation to what individuals are facing day to day. Some key items for the Human Resources Role to consider when Accommodating Employees: Have policies regarding accommodation in the workplace Ensure leaders and employees are walking the walk and talking the talk Train managers on accommodation in the workplace a) This could include Mental Health First Aid, Crisis Interventionist training, Drug and Alcohol Awareness training b) Employer’s Duty to Inquire and Duty to Accommodate Consider Emotional Intelligence training Work with managers and the employee requesting accommodation as per the employer’s Duty to Accommodate and establish an acceptable accommodation Employee Feedback a) Have questions regarding DE&I in the annual employee survey b) Have an open-door policy for employees to make suggestions on how to make the workplace more accessible Work with a local disability organization for assistance on determining if your organization is physically accessible a) is your handicapped parking space large enough? Do you have an automatic door opener? Can someone in a wheelchair reach the automatic door opener? Disability Employment Awareness Month serves as an important reminder that inclusion is not just a celebration—it’s a commitment to equitable workplaces and meaningful participation. Kiesha’s story in Able demonstrates the power of perseverance, the impact of inclusive employment, and the vital role employers play in shaping accessible and supportive environments. Her journey reminds us that when individuals are empowered to bring their full selves to work, everyone benefits—teams grow stronger and perspectives broaden. As HR professionals, we have the responsibility and privilege to lead this change. Through thoughtful policies, continuous training, and genuine engagement with employees, we can remove barriers and foster workplaces where inclusion is lived, not just stated. By prioritizing accessibility, empathy, and flexibility, we create cultures that value every person’s contribution. We can ensure that every employee—regardless of ability—has the resources and support needed to succeed and add meaningful value to Alberta’s workforce.
MORE NEWS