Older Adults Buffer Against Exploitation - An Ageist Series (2 of 3)

08
Aug 2024
CPHR Alberta
153
A group of people are connected to each other in a network.

Author : Manley Osbak 

Excluding older adults from the workforce encourages the development of exploitative environments. Organizations thrive on instrumental transactions in which something is traded for something. Young adults, aged 25 to 45, are often eager to engage in transactional relationships if the rewards are compelling. The resulting demand – supply co-dependence can produce a workplace culture that reduces people to mere instrumentality. Older adults can buffer young people from the emergence of such exploitative cultures, however, by balancing instrumental and competitive values with constitutive and cooperative values.

People make choices about which goals to pursue, attempting to maximize the benefits while minimizing the costs. This process is known as selection, optimization, and compensation. As our available resources change throughout life, so too do our goals. Young adults often prioritize individual distinction and the acquisition of material and social resources. Driven to achieve personal goals, they leverage social interactions strategically and prioritize competitive interests. In optimizing the benefits of their selected goals, young adults may exclude those who don’t directly contribute to their competitive interests, and thereby fail to foresee, minimize, and compensate for unintended consequences.

The early 20th century saw the emergence of Classical Management, shaped by Frederick Taylor’s Scientific Management, Henri Fayol’s Principles of Management, and Max Weber’s development of bureaucratic organizations. This management philosophy emphasized rationality, predictability, impersonality, technical competence, and authoritarianism. Although not inherently limited to instrumentalism, Classical Management has increasingly focused on the instrumental value of resources—assessing the worth of ideas, actions, or objects solely on their utility in achieving desired outcomes. While this approach may be practical for managing objects, it becomes unethical when applied to people.

Instrumental pursuits involve actions that are not inherently rewarding but are pursued because they lead to a reward. Constitutive pursuits are actions that are rewarding in and of themselves, valued for the inherent satisfaction that they provide. Instrumental pursuits, being extrinsically motivated, place the locus of control externally—dependent on others and specific outcomes. Conversely, constitutive pursuits, driven by intrinsic motivation, keep the locus of control internal, anchored within oneself. 

The Classical Management approach can easily over-emphasize instrumentalism: people become objects and the relationship between the business and it’s employees becomes purely transactional. Reduced to mere instrumentality, people’s feelings, intentions, thoughts, and experiences become largely irrelevant. When young adults select instrumental pursuits, they choose work environments that support and reward instrumentalism. The reciprocal demand – supply relationship creates a reinforcing loop that can lead to exploitive work cultures.

The inclusion of older adults can buffer young adults from the development of overly instrumental work cultures by balancing instrumental and competitive values with constitutive and cooperative values. As people transition into middle-adulthood, their focus often shifts from pursuing actions with instrumental value to those with inherent meaning. Older adults tend to prioritize constitutive actions, that lead to positive affect (stable emotional disposition) and social embeddedness and functional community. They are, therefore, uniquely positioned to infuse the workplace with constitutive and cooperative values.

Recent research demonstrates that values change when the perception of time change. When time is seen as expansive, as it may in young adulthood, people are more willing to delay personal authenticity to acquire resources and establish their positions within the competitive hierarchy. As people age, however, they begin to see time as limited, personal authenticity becomes less negotiable, and people are drawn to activities that hold emotional salience or personal significance. Consequently, while young adults may engage in instrumental actions that yield future benefits, older adults tend to prefer constitutive actions that are meaningful in the present.

While middle-aged and older adults may show less interest in opportunities for professional growth and status compared to their younger counterparts, they often demonstrate a greater inclination towards helping others, investing in relationships, and engaging in organizational citizenship behavior. This shift is crucial as it fosters the development of a more balanced workplace culture that can protect young adults from the toxicity of overly instrumental work environments. 

The exclusion of older adults from the workforce not only deprives organizations of valuable experience and wisdom but may foster exploitative environments that over-emphasize instrumental transactions. Young adults, being particularly susceptible to this situation, may find themselves in roles where their worth is measured solely by their output. In contrast, the inclusion of older adults may introduce a more balanced perspective, emphasizing relational and intrinsic values over purely instrumental ones. This intergenerational approach not only enriches the workplace culture but also acts as a protective buffer for younger employees, shielding them from exploitative practices and contributing to a healthier, more supportive work environment. Recognizing and harnessing the diverse strengths of all age groups is essential for creating a more sustainable, productive, and generative workplace.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.


Manley Osbak is a Workforce Development Specialist with Work Locomotion where he leads the development and delivery of supervisor training. As a Certified Training and Development Professional with over 25 years of experience in the energy, construction, and manufacturing sectors, Manley focuses on helping supervisors master their roles in an increasingly complex operating environment. Having authored and coauthored numerous journal papers and trade magazine articles, Manley is well known for his investigative approach and crisp delivery. Connect with him on LinkedIn and access his current work on worklocomotion.Substack.com.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Jessica Jaithoo August 8, 2025
Author : Nicole Mahieux, Nick Canning & Kendal Tremblay Mental health is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone of employee well-being, business resilience and community strength. For HR professionals, supporting mental health is no longer optional—it’s imperative. While conversations around mental health have gained traction in many industries, one critical sector still faces unique and persistent challenges: agriculture. Farmers and agricultural workers play a vital role in food production and national food security. Yet they are among the most vulnerable when it comes to mental health struggles. In fact, they experience some of the highest rates of stress, anxiety, depression—and even suicide. This is not just a personal issue. It's a workforce issue. It's a public health issue. It's a business issue. There are a range of compounding pressures makes farming one of the most mentally taxing professions.  These include: 1.Financial Stress & Unpredictability Unstable markets, weather-dependent outcomes, and shifting government policies contribute to a constant sense of economic uncertainty. 2. Isolation Many farmers work alone and live in rural areas where access to social support is limited. Social isolation increases vulnerability to mental health concerns. 3. Stigma Although mental health stigma is slowly decreasing, it remains a barrier—especially among men, who represent 74% of the agricultural workforce. Traditional gender norms often discourage open conversations or help-seeking.
By Jessica Jaithoo August 7, 2025
As a proud participant in the Glowing Hearts program , CPHR Alberta continues to champion the value that Canadian Armed Forces reservists bring to our workplaces. Since joining the program, we’ve seen firsthand how supporting reservists not only strengthens our communities but also enhances organizational resilience and leadership. The Value of Reservists in the Workplace Reservists are more than military personnel—they are strategic thinkers, adaptable leaders, and skilled collaborators. Their training equips them with discipline, problem-solving abilities, and a mission-focused mindset that translates seamlessly into civilian roles. Captain McKenzie Kibler of The Loyal Edmonton Regiment exemplifies this. In a recent deployment on Operation REASSURANCE, he developed leadership and operational skills that now enrich his civilian career. Watch his story here. Support, Recognition, and Incentives for Employers Supporting reservists doesn’t mean sacrificing business continuity—in fact, it opens the door to meaningful recognition and financial support. Through the Compensation for Employers of Reservists Program (CERP) , employers can receive grants to help offset operational costs when a reservist-employee is away for 30 days or more. At the same time, organizations that register their reservist leave policies with the Glowing Hearts program are publicly recognized on the Canadian Forces Liaison Council website and receive a certificate of support and digital badge. These benefits not only ease the logistical challenges of supporting reservists but also position your organization as a leader in community engagement and national service. Tools and Templates for HR Leaders To make it easier for organizations to support reservists, CPHR Alberta offers a Reservist Leave Policy Template. This resource outlines eligibility, leave procedures, compensation, and compliance with federal and provincial legislation—making it simple to implement a supportive policy. Access the template through the Member Portal.
By Marina Perkovic July 29, 2025
Companies that invest in leadership development see real returns. According to Brandon Hall Group, organizations with strong leadership development programs are 1.5 times more likely to be financially high-performing, reinforcing the clear connection between leadership strength and business success (Brandon Hall Group, 2015). For small to mid-sized businesses, this risk can be especially high. As teams expand and complexity increases, the informal leadership structures that worked early on can start to crack. That’s where proactive leadership development and risk mitigation go hand-in-hand. The Leadership Gap Is a Hidden Business Risk According to a recent CPHR Alberta report, talent development and leadership gaps remain one of the top five organizational risks (CPHR Alberta, 2023). The consequences are rarely immediate, but they compound over time: • Missed growth opportunities • High-potential employees leaving due to lack of career clarity • Poor team morale when unprepared managers struggle to lead • Strategic drift from lack of alignment at the top A growing company without a leadership pipeline is like a car without a spare tire, it might keep rolling, but one unexpected bump can send the whole operation into a tailspin. Risk Mitigation Starts with Leadership Insight The first step in mitigating leadership risk is to move from guesswork to clarity. That means using structured tools like leadership assessments, succession planning frameworks, and targeted coaching to surface the actual capabilities of current and emerging leaders. In professional services firms, for example, it’s common to see technically strong employees promoted into management roles. While they excel in their areas of expertise, they often lack key leadership capabilities like delegation, feedback, and emotional intelligence (Gallo, 2016). Without proper development, this can lead to stalled projects, disengaged teams, and higher turnover. Leadership assessments and focused coaching are essential to identify these gaps early and build the skills needed to lead effectively. Common Leadership Risks in SMBs Every organization faces different risks, but these are some of the most common leadership vulnerabilities seen in growth-stage companies (SHRM, 2022): • Lack of succession planning: Only one person knows how to run a key function, creating bottlenecks and burnout. • Unclear decision-making authority: Teams waste time waiting for approvals or duplicating efforts due to ambiguous roles. • Promotion without preparation: High performers are promoted into leadership roles without training, leading to micromanagement or misalignment. • Poor feedback culture: A lack of honest dialogue means small issues snowball into bigger people problems. • Leadership misfit: A leader’s natural style may clash with the culture or needs of a specific team or situation. Mitigating these risks requires more than a one-time workshop. It takes intentional development, structured tools, and reinforcement over time (SHRM, 2022). What Effective Mitigation Looks Like The most successful companies don’t wait for a leadership crisis to take action. They build leadership strength proactively. Here’s what that looks like: • Leadership assessments are used during hiring and promotions to identify fit, style, and potential blind spots. • Customized coaching programs help leaders build the exact skills they need in real time, tied to their actual challenges (International Coaching Federation, 2022). • Leadership training cohorts (such as PowerUp Leadership’s “Coaching Skills for Managers” or “Authentic Leadership” programs) create a shared foundation across the organization. • Succession maps identify who is ready or could be ready for key roles in 12–24 months, creating a proactive development plan (SHRM, 2022). As companies grow, the complexity of people management increases exponentially. Systems, tools, and strategy all matter but none of them work without effective leadership behind them (McKinsey & Company, 2018). Investing in leadership development isn’t a “nice to have” for big companies, it’s a risk management strategy for every business serious about sustainable growth. 
MORE NEWS