Balancing Organizational and Employee Needs and Interests

28
Sep 2023
CPHR Alberta
43
A group of business people are sitting at a table looking at a piece of paper.

Author : Jodie Jeworski 

As per the CPHR Code of Ethics, Balancing Interests is the duty of HR Practitioners to balance organizational and employee needs and interests within the practice of human resources.  Let’s explore a situation where the HR Business Partner (Jesse) has been asked to be a mediator between a manager (Sandy) and their employee (Taylor).  Sandy and Taylor are experiencing significant interpersonal conflict, and as a result, an investigation was launched with Taylor as the Complainant and Sandy as the Respondent.  While the outcome of the investigation found the allegations of bullying and harassment to have been unfounded, the conflict has not been resolved.  Sandy’s leader, Alex (the owner and CEO), wants a plan for resolution and workplace restoration.

Jesse held initial meetings with Sandy, Taylor, and Alex.  During these discussions, it was discovered that Alex and Taylor are family members; Alex gave Taylor the job.  Although distant, they are cousins and spend quite a bit of time together outside of the workplace.  Alex stated they want to ensure Taylor does not receive any discipline.  Further, Alex would like Sandy reprimanded and suspended without pay for one week.  Alex reminds Jesse that they report to Alex and have an obligation to see a successful outcome for Taylor.

With a clear power differential, Jesse is conflicted.  On the one hand, Jesse knows they have an obligation to be unbiased, act in good faith, respect the legal rights of all individuals, and uphold the CPHR Code of Ethics.  On the other hand, Jesse risks a career-limiting move and potential retaliation (up to and including termination) if the outcome is anything different than Alex stated.  Jesse is new to Calgary, has no friends or family here, and really needs this job.

If Jesse sides with Alex:

  • Bias is clearly demonstrated
  • Not acting in good faith
  • Contravention of the HR Code of Ethics
  • Workplace restoration will be nearly impossible to achieve
  • This could make the strained relationship between Sandy and Taylor worse
  • Either Sandy or Taylor may choose to leave the company

If Jesse follows due process:

  • Unbiased approach
  • Sandy and Taylor are both heard
  • Opportunity to explore options to remove the conflict and restore their professional relationship (which may take significant time and effort by all parties)
  • Upholding the CPHR Code of Ethics

Jesse opts for the second approach: due process.  Jesse hosts second meetings with Sandy and Taylor to determine what they would need and what they see to be helpful in conflict resolution and workforce restoration.  Based on the information gathered, this relationship is salvageable.  A third meeting is held where Jesse is the mediator between Sandy and Taylor.  They each share their thoughts and commit to working on their individual biases, as well as together to enhance their working relationship.  An action plan is established, and everyone has agreed to continue to meet regularly over the next three months.

Following the outcome of the third meeting, Jesse meets with Alex and shares the commitment and established action plan.  Jesse also explains that while there was no discipline for Taylor, there was also no discipline for Sandy.  Jesse explains there were no findings to suggest discipline for either individual.  Jesse also explains the CPHR Code of Ethics and the standards in which Jesse must abide by in order to be an HR Practitioner.  Although this was not a specific ‘win’ for Alex, Alex thanks Jesse for their hard work and promises to keep their relationship (and preferential treatment) outside of the workplace.

The CPHR Alberta Code of Ethics exists to guide HR Professionals in situations just like these every day.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.


The views and opinions expressed in this blog post belong solely to the original author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CPHR Alberta.



By Jessica Jaithoo May 5, 2026
Author: Nidhi Gandhi , 2026 Social Media Committee Volunteer Motherhood is often described as the world’s most demanding job, yet it rarely comes with a job description, a performance review, or a manual. It is a profound and often relentless act of stewardship that asks us to be an anchor, a strategist, and a source of support, sometimes all at once. For modern HR executives, this reality carries added complexity. Our professional lives are spent navigating organizational health, talent development, and culture. We shape workplace policies, advocate for employee well‑being, and bring the people perspective to the leadership table. When we step into the dual role of executive and mother, we aren’t simply balancing two lives; we are bringing together two complementary skill sets. As Deni Ruiz, Executive Director of People and Culture at Keyano College, explains: “In my role, I balance strategy with humanity, supporting leaders and employees, navigating change and complexity, and making tough decisions when needed. I am supported by an amazing team of professionals who care deeply for our colleagues, the College, and the community.” Being both an executive and a mother means showing up focused in the boardroom while also being a safe harbor at home. It requires constant recalibration and a willingness to redefine what success looks like at different stages of life. It also reinforces an important truth: empathy is not just a personal quality, it is a leadership asset. When we asked Deni how she transitions from mom mode to executive mode, she shared: “It’s less of a flip of a switch and more of a recalibration. I go from solving activities, snack logistics, and figuring out the root cause of meltdowns, to solving organizational challenges and understanding what motivates and engages people in the workplace. But at the core, both roles are about supporting people and making good, informed decisions, just at different complexity levels. A deep breath, a chai latte, and I’m in an executive mode. What I find a bit more challenging is transitioning back to ‘mom mode’ at the end of a long, busy day.” In this conversation, we look beyond titles to discuss the realities of nurturing a high‑level career while raising the next generation. Whether you are climbing the ladder, building a team, or navigating your own career path, this dialogue offers both reflection and reassurance that your path can evolve, and that is okay. How has motherhood shaped your approach to HR policies? Does it change how you view things like flexible work, benefits, or performance management? Motherhood has deepened my understanding of how policies land in real life. It’s made me more attuned to what employees are balancing outside of work, including growing demands related to child care, elder care, and mental health. That perspective has strengthened my support for flexible and inclusive workplaces, not as perks, but as tools for retention, productivity, and respect. Being a mom hasn’t lowered performance expectations; it has clarified how we enable people to meet them by recognizing the realities that shape today’s workforce and equipping leaders to respond thoughtfully. What is the most rewarding “full circle” moment you’ve had where your professional role and motherhood intersected? There are moments when I’m coaching my kids on family values, goal setting, or how to navigate conflict with their sibling, and other moments when I’m coaching leaders through difficult workplace conversations or career development decisions. I’ve realized I draw on the same patience, clarity, and empathy in both settings. Seeing those conversations handled well, and knowing they positively affect someone’s experience at work, feels like a true intersection of both roles. Just as each child is different, even within the same family, employees experience work differently. Understanding those realities helps build alignment and trust. What advice would you give to a mid ‑ career HR professional who is hesitant to pursue an executive role because they fear it will compromise their family life? It’s a valid concern. Executive roles come with more responsibility and mental load, but they also offer greater autonomy to shape how and when you work. The key is being intentional. Be clear on your non‑negotiables, choose organizations whose values align with yours, and remember that strong leadership includes modeling sustainable ways of working, not constant availability. If you could give a Mother’s Day gift to working moms, aside from a day off, what would it be? I’d give them the freedom to be genuine and true flexibility, the kind that is trusted, consistent, and free from career trade‑offs. When people don’t have to choose between being present at home and being seen as committed at work, that’s where working moms can truly thrive. The idea of perfect work‑life balance is overrated. Priorities shift over time, and only you and your family know what the right combination looks like in any given season. Deni’s journey reminds us that senior leadership and motherhood are not competing forces to be managed, but complementary roles that strengthen one another. The empathy cultivated at home makes us better leaders, just as strategic thinking at work helps us build stronger foundations for our families. As we celebrate Mother’s Day, let this conversation prompt reflection. You do not have to choose between being a successful professional and a present, nurturing parent. You can be both, and you can lead through both.
By Jessica Jaithoo April 21, 2026
Author: Taia Northrup , 2026 Social Media Committee Volunteer Building Safer Workplaces Every April 28th, World Day for Safety and Health at Work serves as an important reminder that workplace safety isn’t just a policy, it is a commitment to people. While procedures, protocols, and compliance requirements are essential, the true foundation of a safe workplace lies in a culture where employees feel valued, heard, and protected. In today’s evolving environment, safety goes beyond hard hats and hazard signs. It includes psychological safety, inclusive practices, and the ability for employees to speak up without fear. As organizations continue to adapt in a tech driven world, the role of Human Resources in shaping and sustaining this culture has never been more critical. Traditionally, workplace safety has been associated with physical risk prevention. While this is still vital, modern organizations are expanding their focus to include mental health, preventing burnout, and overall well-being. Which Leads to the Culture of Psychological Safety A truly safe workplace is one where employees feel comfortable sharing ideas, raising concerns, and admitting mistakes without fear. Psychological safety is essential for innovation, collaboration, and overall organizational success. Safety doesn’t always require large scale initiatives… Often it is small, consistent actions that make the biggest difference, these include: Checking in with employees regularly Offering training and refreshers Celebrating safe practices and milestones Creating opportunities for feedback As we recognize World Day for Safety and Health at Work, it is an opportunity to reflect on how we can continue to build safer, healthier workplaces. By prioritizing both physical and psychological well-being, organizations can create environments where employees thrive. At its core, safety is about people. When we lead with empathy, listen with intention, and act with purpose, we don’t just meet safety standards, we exceed them!
April 21, 2026
Chartered Professionals in Human Resources (CPHRs) bring a unique and deeply relevant skill set to senior governance roles—particularly those focused on equity, inclusion, and systemic change. With expertise in ethical leadership, organizational governance, people systems, and inclusive decision‑making, CPHR professionals are well positioned to contribute at the highest levels of public service. The Government of Canada is currently seeking applications for the role of Chairperson of the Canadian Race Relations Foundation (CRRF) Board of Directors, a Governor in Council appointment that offers an opportunity to shape national conversations on race relations and advance meaningful change across Canada.
MORE NEWS